C.D. TIRKEY Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
LAWS(CHH)-2013-11-1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Decided on November 01,2013

C.D. Tirkey Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Respondents




JUDGEMENT

- (1.)THE matter is taken up for consideration in the chamber under provisions of sub-rule (2) of Rule 90 under Chapter VI of the High Court of Chhattisgarh Rules, 2007.
(2.)THE review petitioner (for short "the petitioner") seeks review of the order dated 9-10-2013 passed in WP (S) No.3321 of 2013 on the ground that due to inadvertence certain facts & grounds have not been brought before this Court by the petitioner at the time of filing of writ petition or during the course of hearing of the said writ petition.
It is indisputable that the order dated 9 -10 -2013, which is sought to be reviewed herein, has been passed by this Court in WP (S) No.3321 of 2013 on the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner to the extent that "learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition." It is also not in dispute that while withdrawing the said writ petition, the petition has not sought any liberty to revive his prayer before this Court, if occasion arises.

(3.)IT appears that the petitioner by presentation of this review petition seeks an opportunity to argue the entire case afresh on merits under the garb of the review petition, which is not permissible and tenable in law.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.