RANJIT SINGH Vs. STATE OF M.P.
LAWS(SC)-2013-9-85
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: MADHYA PRADESH)
Decided on September 27,2013

RANJIT SINGH Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF M.P. Respondents





Cited Judgements :-

ARMAN KHAN VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2021-11-11] [REFERRED TO]
HIMANSHU SHARMA VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [LAWS(SC)-2024-2-53] [REFERRED TO]
BHOOPENDRA SINGH VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [LAWS(SC)-2021-10-90] [REFERRED TO]
BHARAT KUMAR DAS VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2022-3-60] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VS. SURAJ PAL [LAWS(BOM)-2014-12-113] [REFERRED TO]
JANJANAM LALITHA DEVI VS. STATE OF A P [LAWS(APH)-2018-3-18] [REFERRED TO]
SANJAYBHAI MANUBHAI BHALIYA VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2022-10-592] [REFERRED TO]
ABDUL BASIT VS. ABDUL KADIR CHOUDHARY [LAWS(SC)-2014-9-109] [REFERRED TO]
KAWAL SHARMA VS. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND AND ORS. [LAWS(UTN)-2020-7-38] [REFERRED TO]
HARISH KALRA VS. SMT. SURESH BALA [LAWS(UTN)-2018-5-120] [REFERRED TO]
MEVINDI VEERESHA VS. HARIHAR TOWN POLICE STATION [LAWS(KAR)-2024-7-36] [REFERRED TO]
NARESH KUMAR VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER [LAWS(P&H)-2018-7-88] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MEGHALAYA VS. HEIBORMI DKHAR [LAWS(MEGH)-2021-12-15] [REFERRED TO]
MS. P VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [LAWS(SC)-2022-5-18] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF TELANGANA VS. HABIB ABDULLAH JEELANI & ORS. [LAWS(SC)-2017-1-147] [REFERRED TO]
NAVAS VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-2023-6-74] [REFERRED TO]
RAJESH THOMAS VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2024-1-192] [REFERRED TO]
VIDHYABEN MUKESHBHAI NAYI VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2024-1-78] [REFERRED TO]
MANGILAL GANGARAMBHAI MALI VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2018-4-78] [REFERRED TO]
DEEPAK YADAV VS. STATE OF U.P [LAWS(SC)-2022-5-88] [REFERRED TO]
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH (FOREST DEPARTMENT) VS. JAITMANG [LAWS(MPH)-2016-4-27] [REFERRED TO]
BRIJMOHAN K.S VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [LAWS(KAR)-2021-4-128] [REFERRED TO]
MOHAMED RIFAS VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(MAD)-2023-12-62] [REFERRED TO]
MANSUKHBHAI GANDUBHAI VASOYA (PATEL) VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2024-3-275] [REFERRED TO]
NITINBHAI NARENDRABHAI RAJGURU VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2023-11-54] [REFERRED TO]
YASHWANTKUMAR HIRALAL PATEL VS. HITESHKUMAR CHUNNALAL AGRAWAL & 1. [LAWS(GJH)-2017-9-34] [REFERRED TO]
SANJAYBHAI MANUBHAI BHALIYA VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2022-10-10] [REFERRED TO]
SURAJPAL VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2014-12-263] [REFERRED TO]
SINGASHAN SINGH VS. STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. [LAWS(SC)-2014-12-100] [REFERRED TO]
UMASHANKAR PRABHU B.C. CASHTECH GROUP OF COMPANIES AND ORS. VS. MAHESH SHETTY AND ORS. [LAWS(KAR)-2016-4-90] [REFERRED TO]
SMT. P KALPANA VS. THE STATE OF TELANGANA REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF AP HYDERABAD [LAWS(APH)-2018-6-67] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF KERALA VS. SREERAM VENKITTARAMAN [LAWS(KER)-2019-8-73] [REFERRED TO]
BANWARI LAL VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [LAWS(RAJ)-2020-6-399] [REFERRED TO]
LAKHWINDER SINGH VS. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [LAWS(HPH)-2021-3-79] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)Leave granted.
(2.)This appeal, by special leave, is directed against the order dated 16.8.2013 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Gwalior, in M.Cr.C. No. 3370 of 2013 whereby the learned single Judge has cancelled the order of bail granted by learned first Additional Sessions Judge, Guna vide order dated 6.2.2013 to the appellant.
(3.)The facts giving rise to the present appeal are that on 14.8.2012 an FIR bearing No. 376/2012 was registered at Police Station, Kotwali, Guna, for offences punishable under Sections 307, 147, 148, 149, 120B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act alleging that the appellant along with one Abhishek Hada and two unknown persons had come to the market place where an altercation ensued between them and the informant and others. It was alleged in the FIR that two of these four persons were carrying weapons and they fired at the informant, respondent No. 3 herein, and one Dilip Singh. After the injured succumbed to the injuries, Section 302 IPC was added. The appellant apprehending arrest filed an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) before the first Additional Sessions Judge, Guna, who vide order dated 14.9.2012 rejected the same. Being unsuccessful in obtaining an anticipatory bail the appellant filed M.Cr.C. No. 8023 of 2012 which was dismissed as withdrawn.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.