SEHAJDHARI SIKH FEDERATION Vs. UNION OF INDIA
LAWS(P&H)-2011-12-23
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on December 20,2011

Sehajdhari Sikh Federation Appellant
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA Respondents


Referred Judgements :-

QUEEN V. BURAH [REFERRED TO]
SGPC V. GOVERNOR OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
DK TRIVEDI AND SONS V. STATE OF GUJARAT [REFERRED TO]
GURLEEN KAUR V. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
N P PONNUSWAMI THE UNION OF INDIA AND STATE OF MADHYA BHARAT VS. RETURNING OFFICER NAMAKKAL CONSTITUENCY NAMAKKAL SALEM DIST :RETURNING OFFICER NAMAKKAL CONSTITUENCY NAMAKKAL SALEM DIST [REFERRED TO]
DARSHAN SINGH BALWANT SINGH THE UNION OF INDIA INTERVENER VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER HINDU RELIGIOUS ENDOW MENTS MADRAS VS. LAKSHMINDRA THIRTHA SWAMIAR OF SHIRUR MUTT [REFERRED TO]
HARISHANKAR BAGLA VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
RAJNARAIN SINGH VS. CHAIRMAN PATNA ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE PATNA [REFERRED TO]
SARDAR INDER SINGH SHRI DURGA PARSHAD DWARKA PRASAD AND OHTERS BANKS LAL BAHADUR GANGA SINGH KALU SINGH SURYA BHAGWAN SAHAI VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [REFERRED TO]
KAMLA PRASAD KHETAN VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
HAMDARD DAWAKHANA KALIPADA DEB LAKSHMAN SHRIPATI LTPURE ALIAS LAKSHMAN SHRI PATI IMPORE A B CHOUDHRI VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
VASANLAL MAGANBHAI SANJANWALA THE PRATAP SPINNING WEAVING MANUFACTURING CO LIMITED VS. STATE OF BOMBAY NOW MAHARASHTRA :STATE OF BOMBAY NOW MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
BURRAKUR COAL CO LIMITED EAST INDIAN COAL CO LIMITED VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
PURANLAL LAKHANPAL VS. PRESIDENT OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
P J IRANI VS. STATE OF MADRAS [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF WEST BENGAL PLAINTIFF THE ADVOCATES GENERAL FOR THE STATES OF MADHYA PRADESH THE ADVOCATES GENERAL FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB THE ADVOCATES GENERAL FOR THE STATES OF ASSAM THE ADVOCATES GENERAL FOR THE STATES OF ORISSA THE ADVOCATES GENERAL FOR T VS. UNION OF INDIA DEFENDANT:UNION OF INDIA DEFENDANT:UNION OF INDIA DEFENDANT:UNION OF INDIA DEFENDANT:UNION OF INDIA DEFENDANT:UNION OF INDIA DEFENDANT:UNION OF INDIA DEFENDANT:UNION OF INDIA DEFENDANT:UNION OF INDIA DEFENDANT:UNION OF INDIA DEFE [REFERRED TO]
TILKAYAT SHRI GOVINDLALJI MAHARAJ TRIYAMBAK LAL GOSWAMI SHN CILANSHYAMLAIJI TILKAYAT SHRI GOWINDLAIJI VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [REFERRED TO]
MAKHAN SINGH TARSIKKA SHAMSHER SINGH JOSH GURBUX SINGH ATTA DHANPAT RAI NAHAR DALIP SINGH MUTA SINGH DARSHAN SINGH JHABAL CHANAN SINGH DHUT KARNAIL SINGH FIDA SHRIMATI GODAVARI SHAMRAO PARULEKAR SHAMRAO VISHNU PARULEKAR PRALAD KRISHNA KURANE SHRIPAD YESH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB:STATE OF PUNJAB:STATE OF MAHARASHTRAS:STATE OF MAHARASHTRAS:TH [REFERRED TO]
MEGHRAJ KOTHARI VS. DELIMITATION COMMISSION [REFERRED TO]
MANGAL SINGH VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
KHAMBHALIA MUNICIPALITY VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [REFERRED TO]
SAMPAT PRAKASH S K B REHMAN S NIZAMUDDIN VS. STATE OF FAMMU AND KASHMIR:STATE OF FAMMU AND KASHMIR [REFERRED TO]
MAGANTI SUBRAMANYAM VS. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MEGHALAYA VS. KA BRHYIEN KURKALANG [REFERRED TO]
GWALIOR RATON SILK MANUFACTURING WEAVING CO LIMITED VS. ASSTT COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX [REFERRED TO]
LACHMI NARAIN VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
V TULASAMMA VS. SESHA REDDY [REFERRED TO]
AVINDER SINGH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
ATLAS CYCLE INDUSTRIES LIMITED VS. STATE OF HARYANA [REFERRED TO]
AUTHORISED OFFICER THANJAVUR VS. S NAGAMATHA AYYAR [REFERRED TO]
H H SHRI SWAMIJI OF SHRI AMAR MUTT BHANDARIKERI MUTT VS. COMMISSIONER HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENTS DEPART MENT:STATE OF MYSORE [REFERRED TO]
V B RAJU VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [REFERRED TO]
A V NAGHANE S N BHOWMIK S S JAIN B S DOGRA T N KRISHNAN VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
JYOTI BASU VS. DEBI GHOSAL [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VS. NARAYAN SHAMRAO PURANIK [REFERRED TO]
S P MITTAL SHRI RAGHUBIR AUROBINDO SOCIETY AUROBINDO SOCIETY VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
MAHARASHTRA STATE BOARD OF SECONDARY AND HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION ALPANA V MEHTA VS. PARITOSH BHUPESHKUMAR SHETH:MAHARASHTRA STATE BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION [REFERRED TO]
INDIAN EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS BOMBAY PRIVATE LIMITED BENNETT COLEMAN AND COMPANY LIMITED STATESMAN LIMITED KASTURI AND SONS LIMITED ANANDA BAZAR PATRIKA LIMITED VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
RAMESH BIRCH S M MEHRA RAM KRISHNAN AND SONS CHARAN DASS SALUJA S S SODHI GURDIAL SINGH LAL SINGH SURINDER SHARMA SMT SWARAN KAUR VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
SUPREME COURT EMPLOYEES WELFARE AS SOCIATION SUPREME COURT FOURTH CLASS EM PLOYEES WELFARE ASSOCIATION S P JAIN VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
SITARAM SUGAR COMPANY LIMITED U P STATE SUGAR CORPORATION LIMITED VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
RAMA KANT PANDEY VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
P K SARIN VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
AMRIT BANASPATI COMPANY LIMITED VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
J K INDUSTRIES LIMITED VS. CHIEF INSPECTOR OF FACTORIES AND BOILERS [REFERRED TO]
AGRICULTURAL MARKET COMMITTEE VS. SHALIMAR CHEMICAL WORKS LIMITED [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF TAMIL NADU VS. K SABANAYAGAM [REFERRED TO]
R RUDRAIAH VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [REFERRED TO]
THAMPANOOR RAVI VS. CHARUPARA RAVI [REFERRED TO]
KUNJ BEHARI LAL BUTAIL VS. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
KISHAN PRAKASH SHARMA VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
DISTRICT MINING OFFICER VS. TATA IRON AND STEEL CO [REFERRED TO]
ST JOHNS TEACHERS TRANING INSTITURTE VS. REGIONAL DIRECTOR NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAX RANCHI VS. SWARN REKHA COKES and COALS PRIVATE LIMITED [REFERRED TO]
M P HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
JAMSHED N GUZDAR VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF RAJASTHAN VS. BASANT NAHATA [REFERRED TO]
MULLAPERIYAR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION FORUM VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF TAMIL NADU VS. P KRISHNAMURTHY [REFERRED TO]
KULDIP NAYAR VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
SADASHIV DADA PATIL VS. PURUSHOTTAM ONKAR PATIL [REFERRED TO]
VASU DEV SINGH VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF KERALA VS. UNNI [REFERRED TO]
EMP STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION VS. H M T LTD [REFERRED TO]
MAN SINGH VS. STATE OF HARYANA [REFERRED TO]
KASHMIR SINGH VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOAR VS. PULAK ENTERPRISES [REFERRED TO]
NARESH SHANKAR SRIVASTVA VS. STATE OF U P [REFERRED TO]
K KRISHNA MURTHY VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
COLLECTIVE FARMING SOCIETY VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
SHIROMANI GURDWARAS PARBANDHAK COMMITTEE AMRITSAR AND VS. LACHHMAN SINGH GILL [REFERRED TO]
GURDIT SINGH AULAKH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
DAYANAND ANGLO-VEDIC COLLEGE MANAGING COMMITTEE NEW DELHI VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
JANARDAN PASWAN VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
A K AHLAWAT VS. STATE OF HARYANA [REFERRED TO]
GURLEEN KAUR VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
KASHMIR SINGH VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]



Cited Judgements :-

RAJKUMARI AMRIT KAUR VS. MAHARANI DEEPINDER KAUR [LAWS(P&H)-2020-6-10] [REFERRED TO]
HARBHAJAN SINGH VS. STATE OF HARYANA [LAWS(SC)-2022-9-93] [REFERRED TO]
SATINDER SINGH VS. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS [LAWS(P&H)-2017-8-212] [REFERRED TO]
DR. BHURA SINGH GHUMAN VS. PANJAB UNIVERSITY, CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS [LAWS(P&H)-2016-8-39] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)This order of ours shall dispose of CWP Nos.17771 of 2003; 14179 of 2010; 18160 of 2011 as the issues involved therein are either interlinked or inter-dependent. Before extracting the facts in extenso from CWP No.17771 of 2003, it being the oldest, we deem it appropriate to tersely refer to some of the orders passed by different Division Benches, resulting into placement of these cases before a larger Bench even in the absence of a formal reference order. CWP No.17771 of 2003
(2.)Sehajdhari Sikh Federation - a registered Political Party has preferred this writ petition statedly in public interest, seeking quashing of the Notification dated 8th October, 2003 issued by the Central Government purportedly in exercise of its powers under Section 72 of the Punjab Re-organization Act, 1966 (in short, 'the 1966 Act') whereby Sections 49 and 92 of the Sikh Gurdwara Act, 1925 (in short, 'the 1925 Act') have been 'amended' to the extent of denying the Sehajdhari Sikhs their right to vote in the elections of Sikh Gurdwara Prabandhak Committee (SGPC) i.e. the Board and other statutory Committees constituted under the said Act. The afore-stated writ petition, owing to the public importance of the issue involved, was directed to be posted for hearing along with CWP No.13282 of 2008 (Gurleen Kaur & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Ors.) which had already been referred to and listed before a Full Bench comprising three Judges of this Court.
(3.)The Full Bench while deciding Gurleen Kaur and others v. State of Punjab & Ors.,2009 3 RCR 324 on 30.05.2009 segregated this case by a separate order observing that the controversy raised in the instant writ petition is separate and distinct from the one raised in Gurleen Kaur and other's case.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.