SANGITA Vs. SUKRANT AND ORS.
LAWS(BOM)-2015-1-276
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY (FROM: NAGPUR)
Decided on January 13,2015

SANGITA Appellant
VERSUS
Sukrant And Ors. Respondents


Referred Judgements :-

DASHRATH RUPSINGH RATHOD VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)Heard. Leave to amend paragraph No. 13, after accepting unconditional apology tendered by learned Counsel for the petitioner, is granted. He states that the contentions made therein are absolutely unintentional and without really meaning what is mentioned therein. Accordingly, the portion starting from the words, "But it is mentioned therein.....to the last line ending with the words, "....and illogical interpretation" are permitted to be deleted. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.
(2.)Heard.
(3.)Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.