MOHD. SHAHID KHAN @ RAJA Vs. STATE
LAWS(DLH)-2014-3-350
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Decided on March 10,2014

Mohd. Shahid Khan @ Raja Appellant
VERSUS
STATE Respondents


Referred Judgements :-

JAGROOP SINGH V. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
PRABHU BABAJI NAVLE VS. STATE OF BOMBAY [REFERRED TO]
RAGHAV PRAPANNA TRIPATHI VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
SOLANKI CHIMANBHAI UKABHAI VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [REFERRED TO]
SHARAD BIRDHICHAND SARDA VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
PATTIPATI VENKAIAH VS. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
SUBEDAR TEWARI STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHS:DR NARENDRA NATH TEWARI [REFERRED TO]
PADALA VEERAREDDY VS. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
SURESH CHANDRA BAHRI GURBACHAN SINGH RAJ PAL SHARMA VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
JASPAL SINGH ALIAS PALI DARSHAN SINGH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [REFERRED TO]
SHIV RAM SRIRAM VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF RAJASTHAN VS. TEJA RAM [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF HARYANA VS. BHAGIRATH [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VS. SURESH [REFERRED TO]
GURA SINGH VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [REFERRED TO]
DASARI SIVA PRASAD REDDY VS. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF AP [REFERRED TO]
RAMREDDY RAJESHKHANNA REDDY VS. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
AFTAB AHMAD ANASARI VS. STATE OF UTTARANCHAL [REFERRED TO]
ABDUL SAYEED VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
BHAJAN SINGH ALIAS HARBHAJAN SINGH VS. STATE OF HARYANA [REFERRED TO]
AMITAVA BANERJEE ALIAS AMIT ALIAS BAPPA BANERJEE VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [REFERRED TO]
RAMNARESH VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH [REFERRED TO]
SAHADEVAN VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU [REFERRED TO]
LAXMIBAI VS. BHAGWANTBUVA [REFERRED TO]
R. KUPPUSAMY VS. STATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE [REFERRED TO]
UMESH SINGH VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]
GANGABHAVANI VS. RAYAPATI VENKAT REDDY [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

Sunita Gupta, J. - (1.)CHALLENGE in this appeal is to the judgment dated 20th April, 2011 and order on sentence dated 2nd May, 2011 passed in Sessions Case No. 77/2009 in case FIR No. 109/2009, PS Kapashera whereby the appellant was held guilty of offence u/s. 302 IPC and was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay Rs. 10,000/ - as fine and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo SI for four months. Prosecution case emanates from the fact that on 17th May, 2009, on receipt of a call regarding murder of a male aged about 20 -25 years at Gali No. 8, Kapashera near Govt. Garbage House, near White Flats, New Delhi, PW13, W Constable Sudesh filled the PCR form Ex. PW -13/A and flashed the message to Control Room. On receipt of message, PW -12, W Head Constable Saroj recorded DD No. 12A (Ex. PW -12/A) and entrusted the same to SI Sudan Singh. SI Sudan Singh along with Constable Lakhmi Chand went to Phirni Chowk, Opp. White Flats, near Govt. Dust Bin, Kapashera, New Delhi where he found a dead body of a young man lying on the slope near drain and the park. He informed the SHO who reached the spot. The dead body was having a cut mark on the right side of the neck. There were injury marks on his head and right cheek. His private organ was cut from his body. The dead body was identified by his wife. Blood was lying on the left side of the dead body in the park. One paper cutting blade and one railway ticket from Shahbad to Patel Nagar was lying near the blood. SHO called the crime team. PW -3 ASI Khazan Singh, In -charge, Crime Team reached the spot along with his team. PW -5, Head Constable Rajeev took photographs Ex. PW -5/A -1 to PW -5/A -9 from different angles. After inspection of the site, ASI Khazan Singh gave his report Ex. PW3/A. A blade, railway ticket, blood stained grass and earth control were lifted from the spot and were seized vide different seizure memos. Rukka was sent to police station through Constable Dharam Veer on the basis of which FIR Ex. PW12/B was recorded by PW -12, W Head Constable Saroj. The dead body was sent to DDU Hospital for preservation through Constable Lakhmi Chand.
(2.)IT is further the case of prosecution that on 18th May, 2009, Inspector Lakhender Singh along with one public person Mohd. Rustam went to S.N. Enterprises, 6/12, Shadipur Depot, Kirti Nagar where inquiries were made and it was revealed that PW15 Mohd. Rustam, deceased Mohd. Naushad, accused Mohd. Shahid Khan and Mohd. Irshad Alam were working in S.N. Enterprises as employees. Deceased Mohd. Naushad, being short tempered, used to abuse Mohd. Shahid Khan and Mohd. Irshad Alam. They further came to know that Mohd. Shahid Khan belonged to Jharkhand and Mohd. Irshad Alam belonged to Bihar and both of them would be leaving by train that evening. As such, the police officials along with Mohd. Rustam went to Old Delhi Railway Station. On the pointing out of Mohd. Rustam, accused Mohd. Shahid Khan and Mohd. Irshad Alam were arrested from an open area in front of a park opposite Old Delhi Railway Station. Mohd. Shahid Khan made a disclosure statement, Ex. PW -15/F and got recovered one blood stained broken blade with yellow handle and button generally used for cutting paper and leather, which was seized vide memo Ex. PW -14/A. Mohd. Irshad Alam also made a disclosure statement and got recovered his blood stained T. shirt from his tenanted house in village Kapashera.
On 19th May, 2009, inquest papers were prepared. Postmortem on the dead body of the deceased was conducted by PW2, Dr. Komal Singh and, thereafter, the dead body was handed over to the relatives of the deceased. After post -mortem, Dr. Komal Singh handed over two sealed parcels containing clothes of the deceased and blood gauge along with the sample seal which were taken into possession vide seizure memo Ex. PW -17/A. During the course of investigation, statement of witnesses were recorded. Exhibits were sent to FSL and after completing investigation, charge sheet was submitted against the accused Mohd. Shahid Khan whereas separate challan was filed against accused Mohd. Irshad Alam before Juvenile Justice Board.

(3.)IN order to substantiate its case, prosecution in all examined 19 witnesses. All the incriminating evidence was put to the accused while recording his statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. wherein he admitted that he along with Mohd. Irshad Alam, Mohd. Rustam and deceased Mohd. Naushad used to work in a leather purse manufacturing factory named as S.N. Enterprises at 6/12, Kirti Nagar Industrial Area, New Delhi. He also admitted that he as well as Mohd. Irshad Alam were residing at Kapashera. It was also admitted that one Naseem was working as a contractor in the said factory. 35 -36 workers were working under his supervision and he had divided those workers in sub -groups. However, he denied that deceased Mohd. Naushad was in his group which was headed by Mohd. Rustam. Rest of the case is one of denial simpliciter. According to him, he is innocent. He had a dispute with Mohd. Rustam on account of some payment, which was outstanding towards him. He did not pay the outstanding amount for three months and, as such, Mohd. Rustam got him falsely implicated in this case. According to him, he was lifted from his house on 17th May, 2009 and was taken to police station and kept in lockup. Thereafter, he was taken to a place where there were bushes. Police took out a knife from a box and asked him to hold it and then his photos were taken with mobile. He was falsely implicated in this case. He did not prefer to lead any defence evidence.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.