BALDEV SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB
LAWS(SC)-2011-2-68
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: PUNJAB & HARYANA)
Decided on February 22,2011

BALDEV SINGH Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF PUNJAB Respondents


Cited Judgements :-

RAJU VS. STATE [LAWS(DLH)-2012-11-216] [REFERRED TO]
HARFE RAM VS. STATE OF H P [LAWS(HPH)-2013-7-81] [REFERRED]
RAM NARESH S/O MAIKU VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2017-3-382] [REFERRED TO]
SHANKAR SINGH VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [LAWS(MPH)-2014-3-17] [REFERRED TO]
RAVINDRA VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [LAWS(SC)-2015-2-85] [REFERRED TO]
GOLDI SHARMA VS. STATE OF HARYANA [LAWS(P&H)-2016-2-8] [REFERRED TO]
NITESH RAGHUVANSHI VS. STATE OF MP [LAWS(MPH)-2019-11-161] [REFERRED TO]
GAURI SINGH @ GAURI SHANKAR SINGH VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2014-10-38] [REFERRED TO]
NARENDRA KUMAR MISHRA VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH (NOW CG) [LAWS(CHH)-2020-1-51] [REFERRED TO]
SATISH KUMAR VS. STATE [LAWS(DLH)-2024-12-7] [REFERRED TO]
GUDDU VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. [LAWS(P&H)-2015-9-159] [REFERRED TO]
BHAGWANT SINGH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [LAWS(P&H)-2013-7-1284] [REFERRED]
MOHD IMRAN KHAN VS. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI [LAWS(SC)-2011-10-3] [REFERRED TO]
SHIMBHU VS. STATE OF HARYANA [LAWS(SC)-2013-8-62] [REFERRED TO]
PARMINDER ALIAS LADKA POLA VS. STATE OF DELHI [LAWS(SC)-2014-1-31] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF M.P. VS. MADANLAL [LAWS(SC)-2015-7-7] [REFERRED TO]
C MURALI VS. STATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE [LAWS(MAD)-2016-9-106] [REFERRED]
RAMAY HONHAGA VS. STATE OF JHARKHAND [LAWS(JHAR)-2023-8-58] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)This appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment dated 27.0.2005 IN CRLA No. 242 of 1999 of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh.
(2.)The facts of the case have been set out in the judgment of the High Court and hence we are not repeating the same here, except where necessary.
(3.)The prosecution case is that on 03.03.1997 at about 6.30 A.M. the prosecutrix was coming to her house after answering the call of nature. The three Appellants caught her and took her into a house and raped her and beat her. After police investigation the Appellants were charge sheeted, and after a trial were convicted under Section 376(2)(g) and Section 342 I.P.C. and sentenced to 10 years R.I. and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- each. The sentence was upheld by the High Court, and hence this appeal.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.