JUDGEMENT
Raju, J. -
(1.)Leave granted.
(2.)The Landlady is the appellant in the above appeals of which one arising out of the order dated 19-1-2000 passed by the learned single Judge of the Delhi High Court in C.M. No. 5154/99 in C.R. No. 513/98 rejecting the prayer for converting the application filed initially for eviction under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 into one under Section 14-D of the said Act and to consider the claim of the Landlady accordingly and the other arising out of the order dated 3-7-2000 made in Civil Revision No. 573/98 dismissing the main revision petition.
(3.)Late Shri S.N. Kapoor, the original owner of the premises at A-276, Defence Colony, New Delhi, was serving in the Indian Army and after his retirement he established his residence at Bhopal with his wife and 5 children in the year 1968. The premises in question at New Delhi was under tenancy. In 1982 the eldest son was said to have got married. Late Shri Kapoor and his wife began residing with their eldest son and daughter-in-law. After the Bhopal Gas Leak Accident, Late Shri Kapoor was also affected with serious opthalmic problems and he was undergoing treatment in All India Institute of Medical Sciences at New Delhi. In view of all the above, he called upon the respondents to vacate and deliver vacant possession of the premises for him to occupy by shifting his residence from Bhopal to New Delhi. Since the request was not complied with in 1986, Eviction Case No. E. 119/86 for eviction of the respondent No. 1 came to be instituted also for the reason that the relationship between Mrs. Kapoor and her daughter-in-law were getting strained and in the advance age of Mr. Kapoor he wanted to live in peace with his wife at Delhi. After getting leave to defend, the first respondent opposed the application contesting the bona fides of the landlord.
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.