P SWARAJYALAKSHMI Vs. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
LAWS(APH)-1958-9-6
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Decided on September 02,1958

P.SWARAJYALAKSHMI Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Respondents


Referred Judgements :-

BOARD OF EDUCATION V. RICE [REFERRED TO]
NARAYANAN V. CENTRAL ROAD TRAFFIC BOARD [REFERRED TO]
CHIDAMBARA NADAR V. RAMA NADAR [REFERRED TO]
ANANTHARAJU SHETTY V. APPU HEGADE,AIR 1919 MAD 244 [REFERRED TO]
ABDUL KHADIR V. A.K. MURTHY [REFERRED TO]
CHAPPAN V. MOIDIN KUTTI [REFERRED TO]
NADAR TRANSPORTS V. STATE OF MADRAS [REFERRED TO]
ARUNACHALAM PILLAI V. SOUTHERN RLYS. LTD. [REFERRED TO]
G VEERAPPA PILLAI PROPRIETOR SATHI VILASBUS SERVICE PORAYAR TANJORE DISTRICT MADRAS VS. RAMAN AND RAMAN LTD [REFERRED TO]
NEW PRAKASH TRANSPORT COMPANY LIMITED VS. NEW SUWARNA TRANSPORT COMPANY LIMITED [REFERRED TO]
S J S FERNANDES VS. V RANGANAYAKULU CHETTY [REFERRED TO]



Cited Judgements :-

S A SATTAR VS. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [LAWS(APH)-1970-4-24] [REFERRED TO]
SUSHIL KUMAR SEN GUPTA VS. STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY [LAWS(CAL)-1965-9-15] [REFERRED TO]
RADHA BAI VS. BANKA CHINNAYYA [LAWS(APH)-1967-10-35] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH VS. D VITTAL GOUD [LAWS(APH)-1980-9-4] [REFERRED TO]
N K DHARMADAS VS. STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-1962-5-19] [REFERRED TO]
PATIALA BUS (SIRHIND) PRIVATE LIMITED, SIRHIND AND ANOTHER VS. STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PUNJAB, LUDHIANA AND OTHERS [LAWS(P&H)-1974-8-15] [REFERRED TO]
RADHA BAI VS. BANKA CHINNAYYA AND OTHERS [LAWS(APH)-1962-3-20] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, for the issue of a writ of certiorari to quash the order of the Government of Andhra Pradesh, Home (Transport I) Department, in G. O. Ms. No. 1106 dated 13-5-1958.
(2.)In order to appreciate the contentions raised in the petition, it is necessary to state the material facts. A new, route between Penumudi and Kuchinapudi via Repalle was opened and the Regional Transport Authority, Guntur, invited applications for a stage carriage permit on that route. The petitioner was among the twenty applicants for the permit. In its proceedings dated 25-9-1956, the Regional Authority granted the permit to the petitioner. Thereupon six of the unsuccessful applicants preferred appeals to the State Transport Authority, Andhra Pradesh, By its proceedings dated 12-3-1957, the State Authority set aside the order of the Regional Authority and granted the permit to the 4th respondent. Aggrieved by this order, the petitioner preferred a revision to the Government under Section 64-A of the Motor Vehicles Act. In G. O. Ms. No. 1106 dated 13-5-1958, the Government set aside the orders pf both the subordinate authorities and remitted the case to the Regional Authority, Guntur for fresh disposal according to law.
(3.)Before us, learned counsel for the petitioner contends that there is no power under Section 64-A of the Motor Vehicles Act enabling the Government to remand a case to the Regional Authority for fresh disposal.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.