G. APPARAO Vs. GORLE DEMUDAMMA
LAWS(APH)-2022-5-28
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Decided on May 04,2022

G. Apparao Appellant
VERSUS
Gorle Demudamma Respondents


Referred Judgements :-

K S BHOOPATHY VS. KOKILA [REFERRED TO]
V. RAJENDRAN VS. ANNASAMY PANDIAN [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)Sri Nemani Venkateswarulu, learned counsel, representing Ms. T.V. Sridevi, learned counsel for the revision petitioners, was heard on the previous day of hearing and there is no representation for the respondents/ plaintiffs on that day. Even today, there is no representation for the respondents. Sri Nemani Venkateswarulu, learned counsel, representing learned counsel for the revision petitioners, is present.
(2.)This revision petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the orders, dtd. 7/12/2017 passed in I.A.No.682 of 2017 in O.S.No.42 of 2010 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Chodavaram.
(3.)The petition in I.A.No.682 of 2017 was filed by both the plaintiffs under Order 23 Rule 1 read with Sec. 151 CPC by the first plaintiff seeking permission to withdraw the suit, with a liberty to file a fresh suit, if necessary. The same has been allowed after hearing both the parties. Aggrieved by the same, the present revision petition is filed.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.