SANJAY BANSAL Vs. STATE OF U.P.
LAWS(ALL)-2019-5-345
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD (FROM: LUCKNOW)
Decided on May 02,2019

SANJAY BANSAL Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF U.P. Respondents


Referred Judgements :-

MEEKIN TRANSMISSION LTD.,KANPUR NAGAR V. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [REFERRED TO]
NIRANJAN LAL AGARWAL V. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (ASSESSMENT) [REFERRED TO]
MEEKIN TRANSMISSION LTD VS. STATE OF U P [REFERRED TO]
R.K. CHADDHA VS. STATE OF U.P. [REFERRED TO]
KANWAR HASAN VS. STATE OF U.P. [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)Heard Sri Amrendra Nath Tripathi, Advocate, for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondents.
(2.)Adjudication Case No. 108 of 2015 was decided by Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-2, U.P. Lucknow vide award dated 26.04.2016. The parties in the said case were M/s Total Presentation Devices Private Limited; Manager, H.R. of above Company and Branch Manager of above Company being employer and Sri Anoop Kumar Srivastava, was the Workman. The operative part of award reads as under:
...[VARNACULAR TEXT UMITTED]...

"On the basis of above, I made ex-parte award that depriving/removing the Workman Sri Anoop Kumar Srivastava son of Late Mahraj Bahadur Srivastava, posted as Senior Customer Supports Engineer by the employers vide order dated 01.12.2012 with effect from 31.12.2012 is not valid and legal and applicant-workman is entitled to be reinstated in continuous service without any break with full back wages and other benefits. (English Translation by Court)

(3.)Since the aforesaid dues of Workman were not paid, he moved an application under Section 6(H)(1) of U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as "Act, 1947") whereafter recovery certificate has been issued by Additional Labour Commissioner, Lucknow Region, Lucknow and petitioner is one of three persons against whom recovery certificate has been issued.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.