JUDGEMENT
-
(1.)Heard learned counsel for the parties.
(2.)On 5.11.2019, the Court had passed the following order:-
"Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned standing counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and Sri S.K. Srivastava, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 3 and 4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that earlier petitioner No. 3 has filed Writ-A No. 10187 of 2016 (Tahzeeb Fatma vs. State of U.P. and 3 others) which was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 30.01.2018 in terms of order dated 30.01.2018 passed in Writ-A No. 6004 of 2016 (Sartaj Ahmad and 5 others Vs. State of U.P. and 3 others) along with other connected petitions.
(3.)As per paragraph 11(i) of the judgment of Sartaj Ahmad (Supra), petitioners are fully eligible for appointment. Relevant paragraph 11(i) of the judgment of Sartaj Ahmad (Supra) is quoted below:-
"(i) All the petitioners who had taken admission prior to 11.8.1997 in the Moallim-E-Urdu training course and have cleared it during academic session 1997-98 would be entitled to be considered for appointment to the post of Assistant Teacher in Urdu in the primary institutions run by the Department of Basic Education, Uttar Pradesh, for which process had been initiated vide Government Order dated 5.1.2016."
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.