JUDGEMENT
RAJESH CHANDRA,J. -
(1.)HEARD Sri Sumit Goyal learned Counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and also perused the relevant record.
On 7.7.2008 one car belonging to Dr. Vikas Mehrotra was stolen and the report was lodged against unknown person. On 10.7.2008 the car was recovered from the possession of the accused-applicant. Learned Counsel for the accused-applicant argued that he is not named in the FIR and the recovery has been planted.
(2.)LEARNED State Counsel argued that the accused-applicant is also involved in one case of Arms Act, one case under section 414, IPC and two cases under section 379 IPC. In reply learned Counsel for the accused-applicant argued that he is on bail in all those cases. It is also argued that he is in jail since 11.7.2008.
I have considered over the respective arguments. Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the mature of the offence and the period of detention. I feel that a case of bail is made out.
Let the accused-applicant Shakeel involved in case crime No. 192 of 2008 under sections 379, 411 IPC. P.S. Quarsi, District Aligarh, be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and on furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned, subject to the following conditions.
1. He will regularly appear in the lower Court on every date personally or through his Counsel. 2. He will not seek any adjournment when the prosecution witnesses are present. 3. He will not intimidate or threaten the-witnesses and will not tamper with the evidence.
(3.)IF any of the above conditions is violated, the matter shall Jjef eported to this Court concerned for cancellation of bail. Let a copy of this order be sent to the C.J.M. concerned to ensure compliance of this order.
Application Allowed.
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.