JUDGEMENT
Shishir Kumar, J. -
(1.)Heard Shri S.K. Tyagi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Manu Saxena, for the respondent No. 2.
(2.)This writ petition has been filed against an order dated 23.10.2002 by
which an application filed by the petitioner for impleadment in the appeal filed by
the respondent-landlord against one Subhash Chandra Jain has been rejected.
(3.)It appears that Subhash Chandra Jain who claims to be a land lord of the
premises in dispute filed an application for release of the said accommodation
against respondent No. 3. The Prescribed Authority allowed the application. An
appeal was filed by respondent No. 3 and during the pendency of the appeal, the
petitioner moved an application that he is the brother of the original landlord and is
living with the respondent No. 3 as well as the property has been purchased in
auction and the total amount has already been deposited, therefore, he is a
necessary party to be impleaded in the proceedings.
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.