JUDGEMENT
-
(1.)THIS is a plaintiffs appeal and
it arises out of a partition suit No. 32 of 1976
filed by the present appellants claiming 2/
3rd share in the three houses detailed in
schedules A, B, and C of the plaint. The suit
having been decreed with respect to the
property detailed in schedules B and C and
dismissed with respect to the property
described in schedule A, the plaintiffs have
come up in the present appeal. The defendants have not filed any appeal and,
therefore, the dispute is confined to the property
described in schedule A which is a house
with open piece of land and a latrine.
(2.)THE suit was instituted on the pleas
that one Khaira was a common ancestor of
the plaintiffs and defendants No. 1, 8 and
9. After his death, the property was inherited
by his widow Smt. Guriha. On the death
of Smt. Guriha, the property was inherited
by her two daughters and one son, namely,
mst. Tazia Alias Zainab and Mst. Nuria and
son Hussain. All these persons came in joint
possession of the property left by Smt. Gurhia. Smt. Gurhia, according to the plaintiffs,
had three houses described in schedules A, B, and C of the plaint. After the death
of Husain (son), his widow Gafooran defendant No. 1
inherited the share of her husband.
(3.)THE plaintiffs are the sons of Smt. Nuria. Mst. Tazia alias Zainab had four issues
out of which two issues, namely, Dadu
ali alias Peer Mohd. and Chairun died is-sueless and remaining two issues, namely,
mst. Mahengi and Fakir Mohd. were im-pleaded
as defendants No. 8 and 9 respectively. It was further pleaded that Smt. Gafooran sold her share to one Imam Khan
by means of two sale deeds and after death
of Imam Khan his heirs defendants No. 2 to
7 succeeded to the property.
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.