RAMZAN Vs. GAFOORAN
LAWS(ALL)-2007-9-170
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on September 28,2007

RAMZAN Appellant
VERSUS
GAFOORAN Respondents





Cited Judgements :-

GIRISH CHANDRA VS. SHEO NATH [LAWS(ALL)-2013-5-43] [REFERRED TO]
SHAMBHOO VS. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION FAIZABAD [LAWS(ALL)-2014-11-162] [REFERRED TO]
BANSH RAJ VS. RAJ PAT AND ORS. [LAWS(ALL)-2016-1-136] [REFERRED TO]
RAM ABHILAKH & OTHERS VS. UDIT NARAIN & OTHERS [LAWS(ALL)-2016-7-267] [REFERRED]
VOL : 3; SUNNI CENTRAL BOARD OF WAQFS AND ORS VS. GOPAL SINGH VISHARAD AND ORS [LAWS(ALL)-2010-9-627] [REFERRED]
SANDEEP BHATNAGAR, AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS [LAWS(ALL)-2016-1-395] [REFERRED TO]
U.P. GANDHI SMARAK NIDHI VS. AZIZ MIAN [LAWS(ALL)-2013-2-71] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF U.P. VS. 1ST ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LUCKNOW [LAWS(ALL)-2013-2-158] [REFERRED TO]
RAMA SANKAR VS. OM PRAKASH LIKKDHARI [LAWS(ALL)-2013-4-127] [REFERRED TO]
BABU VS. KHUDIAL QAYUM [LAWS(ALL)-2013-3-172] [REFERRED TO]
LALLAN SINGH VS. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION AND OTHERS [LAWS(ALL)-2017-2-329] [REFERRED TO]
BHIKHARI VS. D.D.C. AND OTHERS [LAWS(ALL)-2018-1-676] [REFERRED TO]
GAYA PRASAD VS. NATHU SINGH [LAWS(ALL)-2019-3-143] [REFERRED TO]
LATOOREE VS. SHYAM LAL (SINCE DECEASED AND REPRESENTED BY LRS.) [LAWS(ALL)-2019-2-318] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)THIS is a plaintiffs appeal and it arises out of a partition suit No. 32 of 1976 filed by the present appellants claiming 2/ 3rd share in the three houses detailed in schedules A, B, and C of the plaint. The suit having been decreed with respect to the property detailed in schedules B and C and dismissed with respect to the property described in schedule A, the plaintiffs have come up in the present appeal. The defendants have not filed any appeal and, therefore, the dispute is confined to the property described in schedule A which is a house with open piece of land and a latrine.
(2.)THE suit was instituted on the pleas that one Khaira was a common ancestor of the plaintiffs and defendants No. 1, 8 and 9. After his death, the property was inherited by his widow Smt. Guriha. On the death of Smt. Guriha, the property was inherited by her two daughters and one son, namely, mst. Tazia Alias Zainab and Mst. Nuria and son Hussain. All these persons came in joint possession of the property left by Smt. Gurhia. Smt. Gurhia, according to the plaintiffs, had three houses described in schedules A, B, and C of the plaint. After the death of Husain (son), his widow Gafooran defendant No. 1 inherited the share of her husband.
(3.)THE plaintiffs are the sons of Smt. Nuria. Mst. Tazia alias Zainab had four issues out of which two issues, namely, Dadu ali alias Peer Mohd. and Chairun died is-sueless and remaining two issues, namely, mst. Mahengi and Fakir Mohd. were im-pleaded as defendants No. 8 and 9 respectively. It was further pleaded that Smt. Gafooran sold her share to one Imam Khan by means of two sale deeds and after death of Imam Khan his heirs defendants No. 2 to 7 succeeded to the property.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.