RAM BHAROSEY Vs. PRADEEP KUMAR AND ANOTHER
LAWS(ALL)-2003-12-175
HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Decided on December 01,2003

RAM BHAROSEY Appellant
VERSUS
Pradeep Kumar and another Respondents

JUDGEMENT

S.P.MEHROTRA, J. - (1.)THE present writ petition has been filed by the peti­tioner Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, praying for quashing the order dated 22.9.2003 (Annexure No. 6 to the writ petition) passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division)/Prescribed Authority, Badaun.
(2.)THE dispute relates to an accommodation situated in Mohalla Shahbazpur, Chauraha near Tikatganj, Badaun, the details whereof are given in the release application referred to hereinafter. The said accommodation has hereinafter been referred as "the disputed accommodation".
From the allegations made in the writ petition and annexures thereto, it appears that Ram Narain (predecessor-in-interest of the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 herein) filed a release application under section 21(1)(a) of the U.P. Act No. XIII of 1972 (in short "the Act") against the petitioner for release of the disputed accommodation. The said release application was registered as Rent Case No. 1 of 1993.

(3.)DURING the pendency of the said release application, the said Ram Narain expired and the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 herein were substituted as the heirs and legal representatives of the said Ram Narain.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.