JUDGEMENT
-
(1.)HEARD learned advocate for the petitioners. Rule. Rule is waived by learned advocates for the
respective parties and is fixed forthwith.
(2.)THE petitioners have taken out these petitions invoking provision of Section 482 of the Criminal
Procedure Code for quashing the complaint being I-
C.R. No.956/2004, in both the petitions, lodged with
Satellite Police Station, District Ahmedabad for
the offences punishable under sections 406, 420, 465,
467, 468, 471, and 120B of Indian Penal.
The matters are compromised and settled between the parties. Learned advocate for the legal heirs of
complainant respondent no.2, Shri Jatin V.Modi has
placed on record affidavit of legal heirs of
complainant-respondent no.2 and submits that he will
file his Vakalatnama during the course of the day or
latest by tomorrow. In view of this, learned
advocates for the parties have requested this Court
to dispose of both the matters and the complaint may
be quashed.
(3.)LEARNED advocate for the petitioners has relied upon the decision of the Apex Court in case of Gian
Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another, reported in
(2012) 10 SCC 303, and another decision in case of
Jay Rajsinh Digvijaysinh Rana Vs. State of Gujarat &
Anr, reported in GLR 2013 (1) pg. 65, as well as the
observations of this Court in case of Rajbha Babhbha
@ Rajendrasinh Annirudhsinh Sarvaiya & Ors, in
Criminal Misc. Application No. 260/2013 decided on
21/2/2013; submitted that in light of the observations in these judgments the FIR in question
deserves to be quashed.
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.