JUDGEMENT
-
(1.)THIS case was heard at length on 16.3.2009 and the facts were recorded in the order on the said date along with the contentions of both the
parties.
(2.)IN the course of arguments, the stand of the petitioner that he did not apply under the 6th SFS Scheme after the year 2002 for the reason
that the respondent issued a letter dated 25.3.2000 intimating him about
the allotment of a flat in his favour at Jhilmil, Delhi, was sought to be
disputed by the counsel for the respondent by taking a plea that the
petitioner was duly intimated of the cancellation of the said flat, vide
letter dated 4.8.2000. However, as nothing was placed on the record to
establish the mode of intimation of the cancellation letter date 4.8.2000
stated to have been issued to the petitioner, the respondent/DDA was
called upon to produce the relevant records today to show mode of
intimation of the cancellation letter to the petitioner.
Counsel for the respondent/DDA states today that the dispatch register of the department for the relevant year has been examined and the mode of
dispatch of said letter dated 4.8.2000 does not feature in the register.
He furth submits that the dispatch records also do not reflect that the
allotment letter dated 25.3.2000 was dispatched to the petitioner.
(3.)COUNSEL for the petitioner states that the aforesaid fact only fortifies his ase that the petitioner was never intimated about the
cancellation of the allotment letter and therefore remained under the
bona fide impression that he had been allotted a flat by the DDA and only
the demand-cum-allotment letter was required to be issued to him. Thus,
he did not apply under the SFS Scheme after the year 2000.
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.