VISHWANATHA ACHARI Vs. KANAKASABAPATHY
LAWS(SC)-2005-7-22
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: MADRAS)
Decided on July 26,2005

VISHWANATHA ACHARI Appellant
VERSUS
KANAKASABAPATHY Respondents


Cited Judgements :-

LAKSHMI NARASAMMA VS. MANGALA GOWRINAG AND ORS. [LAWS(KAR)-2015-3-155] [REFERRED TO]
MUNNOOTTAM KUZHIYIL VAYALOLI BALAN NAMBIAR VS. THEKKEDATH SANKARA KURUP [LAWS(KER)-2013-11-81] [REFERRED TO]
BHEEM CHAND AND ANR VS. LEKH RAJ AND ORS [LAWS(HPH)-2018-12-92] [REFERRED TO]
ANNAPPA PRABHU VS. SANJEEVA SHETTY [LAWS(KAR)-2023-4-526] [REFERRED TO]
K M KESAVAN VS. DIRECTOR/COMMISSIONER OF SERICULTURE DISTRICT [LAWS(MAD)-2008-9-374] [REFERRED TO]
BALAN NAMBIAR M K V VS. SANKARA KURUP T [LAWS(KER)-2013-11-160] [REFERRED TO]
JOSE LALICHAN AND ANOTHER VS. AUGUSTIN [LAWS(KER)-2010-9-354] [REFERRED TO]
OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD VS. AMIT SHIP MANAGMENT PVT LTD [LAWS(GJH)-2018-4-24] [REFERRED TO]
LOHIT CH. BARUAH VS. ARUNA BARUAH [LAWS(GAU)-2020-1-3] [REFERRED TO]
JOSE LALICHAN VS. AUGUSTIN [LAWS(KER)-2011-9-50] [REFERRED TO]
KARMA DENKA BHUTIA AND ORS. VS. LAKPA SHERPA AND ORS. [LAWS(SIK)-2015-10-3] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

Arijit Pasayat, J. - (1.)This appeal is directed against the judgment rendered by a learned Single Judge of the Madras High Court dismissing the second appeal filed by the appellant on the ground that there was no challenge to the finding recorded by the First Appellate Court regarding adverse possession.
(2.)A brief reference to the factual aspects would suffice.
(3.)A suit was filed by the respondents for declaration of title, and the suit was numbered as O. S. No.59/88. Written statement was filed by the appellant who was the defendant. The trial Court framed the following issues:
a) Whether the disputed property belongs to the plaintiff

b) Whether the suit is maintainable

c) What remedy/relief the plaintiff is entitled to



Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.