JOYDEEP MAJUMDAR Vs. BHARTI JAISWAL MAJUMDAR
LAWS(SC)-2021-2-70
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Decided on February 26,2021

Joydeep Majumdar Appellant
VERSUS
Bharti Jaiswal Majumdar Respondents


Referred Judgements :-

SAMAR GHOSH VS. JAYA GHOSH [REFERRED TO]



Cited Judgements :-

G. VINOD KUMAR REDDY VS. G. SUHASINI [LAWS(TLNG)-2022-9-102] [REFERRED TO]
DILIP KUMAR PRAJAPATI VS. ANITA PRAJAPATI [LAWS(CHH)-2023-1-90] [REFERRED TO]
G. SRINIVAS VS. S. ANURADHA [LAWS(KAR)-2023-3-242] [REFERRED TO]
T. ROOPA VS. MANJUNATHA A. B. [LAWS(KAR)-2023-3-339] [REFERRED TO]
SAMEER ARJUN WAGHMARE VS. SUNITA SAMEER WAGHMARE [LAWS(BOM)-2023-9-162] [REFERRED TO]
NANJUNDA SWAMY VS. S.MANGALA [LAWS(KAR)-2022-6-937] [REFERRED TO]
JYOTISH CHANDRA THAPLIYAL VS. DEVESHWARI THAPLIYAL [LAWS(ALL)-2024-7-58] [REFERRED TO]
SANJEEV CHOKHANI VS. GARIMA CHOKHANI [LAWS(JHAR)-2023-7-72] [REFERRED TO]
MANJU KUMARI VS. ANIL KUMAR [LAWS(JHAR)-2023-2-68] [REFERRED TO]
RANJAN BARUAH VS. SHRAVANI KHOUND BARUAH [LAWS(GAU)-2023-9-58] [REFERRED TO]
SANJEEV CHOKHANI VS. GARIMA CHOKHANI [LAWS(JHAR)-2023-7-1] [REFERRED TO]
AVIJIN.K.DOMINIC VS. BEENA [LAWS(KER)-2024-2-202] [REFERRED TO]
BABITA TRIPATHI VS. PRAMOD RAM TRIPATHI [LAWS(ALL)-2024-7-57] [REFERRED TO]
BASANT KUMAR DWIVEDI VS. KANCHAN DWIVEDI [LAWS(ALL)-2024-8-47] [REFERRED TO]
RAVIKUMAR S. VS. SOMYA S.O. [LAWS(KAR)-2023-3-103] [REFERRED TO]
RAJVEER SINGH VS. GAGANJOT KAUR [LAWS(P&H)-2022-3-2] [REFERRED TO]
VIVEK KUMAR VS. HANSHIKA GUPTA [LAWS(JHAR)-2024-2-53] [REFERRED TO]
DEEPAK KUMAR DEWANGAN VS. GUNJA DEWANGAN [LAWS(CHH)-2022-9-88] [REFERRED TO]
CHETHANA ALIAS JYOTHI VS. PRAKASHA [LAWS(KAR)-2023-3-465] [REFERRED TO]
D. NARASIMHA VS. D. ANITA VAISHNAVI [LAWS(TLNG)-2024-6-14] [REFERRED TO]
G. V. MUTHUKUMAR VS. AKILANDESWARI [LAWS(MAD)-2022-1-237] [REFERRED TO]
MAJOR CHARANJIT SINGH SANDHU VS. SUKHJEET KAUR [LAWS(P&H)-2022-5-243] [REFERRED TO]
JITENDRA CHANDRAKAR VS. NAMITA CHANDRAKAR [LAWS(CHH)-2024-2-90] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

HRISHIKESH ROY,J. - (1.)Heard Mr. Gopal Sankaranarayanan, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant (Husband). Also heard Mr. Ahmad Ibrahim, learned counsel appearing for the respondent (Wife).
(2.)The challenge in these appeals is to the analogous judgment and order dated 25.6.2019 in the First Appeal No. 81 of 2017 and First Appeal No. 82 of 2017 whereby the High Court of Uttarakhand had allowed both appeals by reversing the common order dated 4.7.2017 of the Family Court, Dehradun. Before the Family Court, the appellant succeeded with his case for dissolution of marriage but the respondent failed to secure a favourable verdict in her petition for restitution of conjugal rights.
(3.)The appellant is an Army Officer with M.Tech qualification. The respondent is holding a faculty position in the Government P G College, Tehri with Ph.d degree. They got married on 27.9.2006 and lived together for few months at Vishakhapatnam and at Ludhiana. But from the initial days of married life, differences cropped up and since 15.9.2007, the couple have lived apart.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.