JUDGEMENT
PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA,J. -
(1.)By this appeal under Sec. 374(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the appellant has challenged the judgment
dtd. 17/5/2000 passed by the Vth Additional Sessions Judge,
Bhopal in Sessions Trial No.390/1999 whereby, the appellant
has been convicted for the offences punishable under Ss. 376 and 506 of the IPC and sentenced to Life Imprisonment for offence under Sec. 376 with fine of Rs.1.00 lakh and also
sentenced to one year RI for the offence under Sec. 506 of
IPC and default sentence of six months in case of non-payment
of the fine amount. Both sentences are to run concurrently.
(2.)The prosecution case is that the prosecutrix is the daughter of the appellant and when she was aged about 8 years, her mother Reshma Bi
had died due to illness. After the death of mother of the prosecutrix, the
appellant had married twice and one of the wives had fled away and
second had died and the third wife of the appellant was Jarina Bi.
Further case of the prosecution is that when the prosecutrix was aged
about 12 years, at that time, the appellant had committed rape upon her
for the first time inspite of the resistance by the prosecutrix. The
prosecutrix was also threatened by the appellant of severe consequence
in case of disclosure of the incident to anybody. Thereafter the
appellant used to commit rape every now and then. In 1994, the
jhuggies were removed and the appellant along with the prosecutrix
came to Goutam Nagar Janta Quarter but he had continued to rape the
prosecutrix.
(3.)On the 25th August at night when he was committing rape, at that time, Jarina Bi, the stepmother of the prosecutrix, had seen it and the
appellant had beaten Jarina Bi. On the third day, Jarina Bi had asked
the prosecutrix to go to Jaitoon Bi, the sister of the appellant (Bua) and
disclose the entire incident. On 5/10/1999, in the afternoon, the
prosecutrix left the house and went to Bareli where her Bua was
residing but on reaching Bareli, she found that Jaitoon Bi had gone to
Bhopal, therefore, she waited at Bareili and on 7/10/1999, when
Jaitoon Bi came back from Bhopal, the prosecutrix had disclosed the
entire incident to Jaitoon Bi, who had taken the prosecutrix to the police
station where the FIR (Ex.P/1) was registered and the investigation
started. The spot man was prepared, medical examination of the
prosecutrix was done and her frock was sent for the chemical
examination. After completing the investigation, Police had filed the
challan, appellant had abjured the guilt and the trial took place.
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.