TARUN KATARIA Vs. UNION OF INDIA
LAWS(DLH)-2024-2-331
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Decided on February 12,2024

Tarun Kataria Appellant
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA Respondents


Referred Judgements :-

OM PRAKASH SHUKLA V. AKHILESH KUMAR SHUKLA [REFERRED TO]
MANAK LAL ADVOCATE VS. PREM CHAND SINGHVI [REFERRED TO]
G SARANA VS. UNIVERSITY OF LUCKNOW [REFERRED TO]
MADANLAL VS. STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR [REFERRED TO]
K MANJUSREE VS. STATE OF A P [REFERRED TO]
VIJENDRA KUMAR VERMA VS. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION UTTARAKHAND [REFERRED TO]
RAMESH CHANDRA SHAH VS. ANIL JOSHI [REFERRED TO]
MANISH KUMAR SHAHI VS. STATE OF BIHAR [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

REKHA PALLI, J. - (1.)The present writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeks to assail the order dtd. 6/4/2018 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal in O.A No. 1664/2016. Vide the impugned order, the learned Tribunal has rejected the original application preferred by the petitioner wherein he had sought appointment to the post of Junior (ECG) Technician.
(2.)At the outset, the brief factual matrix as is necessary for adjudication of the present petition may be noted.
(3.)On 27/5/2013, the respondent no.3/Dr. RML Hospital issued an advertisement inviting applications for filling up 15 posts of Jr. (ECG) Technician out of which, 4 posts were reserved for OBC category candidates, to which category, the petitioner belongs. As per the 'Scheme of Selection' referred in the aforesaid advertisement, the selection to the posts of Jr. (ECG) Technician was to be made only on the basis of an interview which was to be conducted by a 'Selection Committee' constituted by the respondent no. 3-hopsital. It was further clarified in the 'Scheme of Selection' that in case the number of applications received for a particular post were very large, a shortlisting criteria for calling candidates for interview may be adopted.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.