SUNIL VASUDEVA Vs. SUNDAR GUPTA
LAWS(SC)-2019-7-14
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Decided on July 02,2019

SUNIL VASUDEVA Appellant
VERSUS
Sundar Gupta Respondents





Cited Judgements :-

P. PREM KUMAR VS. M. MOHAN RAO [LAWS(TLNG)-2024-11-3] [REFERRED TO]
ANU BHALLA VS. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PATHANKOT [LAWS(P&H)-2020-9-129] [REFERRED TO]
BAJAJ FINANCE LTD VS. M/S. ALI AGENCY [LAWS(ORI)-2022-1-3] [REFERRED TO]
ABDUL RAHIM SHOLLA VS. CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR [LAWS(J&K)-2021-7-37] [REFERRED TO]
H.M.RENUKARADHYA VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [LAWS(KAR)-2023-7-815] [REFERRED TO]
SHEKHAR RESORTS LIMITED(UNIT HOTEL ORIENT TAJ VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(SC)-2023-1-10] [REFERRED TO]
GAURI ROY CHOUDHURY VS. MANOBIKASH DATTA BISWAS [LAWS(TRIP)-2022-3-44] [REFERRED TO]
ANIL AGARWAL VS. SURESH CHAND [LAWS(RAJ)-2023-12-119] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

RASTOGI,J. - (1.)Leave granted.
(2.)The present appeal is being filed against the impugned judgment dated 24th September, 2014 passed by the High Court of Calcutta in RVW No. 272 of 2012 recalling the Order dated 19 th October, 2012 and while setting aside the order dated 31 st March, 2006 restoring the Writ Petition No. 18500(W) of 1985 to be heard on its own merits as expeditiously as possible which is a subject matter of challenge in appeal before us.
(3.)The facts that emerge from the multitude and collateral and exhaustive pleadings of the parties in nutshell are that respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3 (writ petitioners) are the grandsons of Kirodimull Lohariwala and sons of Premchand Gupta both since deceased, who constituted a H.U.F. which owned property No. 43, Prithviraj Road, New Delhi(subject property) standing in their joint names having other properties at Calcutta.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.