MANAK LAL ADVOCATE Vs. PREM CHAND SINGHVI
LAWS(SC)-1957-2-4
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: RAJASTHAN)
Decided on February 06,1957

MANAK LAL,ADVOCATE Appellant
VERSUS
PREM,CHAND SINGHVI Respondents


Cited Judgements :-

NARINDER SINGH ARORA VS. STATE [LAWS(SC)-2011-12-29] [REFERRED TO]
LALIT KUMAR MODI VS. BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET IN INDIA [LAWS(SC)-2011-9-5] [REFERRED TO]
NARDEEP KUMAR MAHESHWARI VS. INDIAN OIL CORPORATION AND ORS. [LAWS(P&H)-2002-3-70] [REFERRED TO]
PRITAM GAJ KUMAR SHAH VS. NATIONAL COUNCIL OF TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR. [LAWS(RAJ)-2002-12-40] [REFERRED TO]
NATIONAL TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTIONS VS. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY [LAWS(KAR)-2012-6-222] [REFERRED TO]
Jitendra Pandey VS. Bagar Sah [LAWS(PAT)-1978-4-2] [REFERRED TO]
LEKH RAJ NARINDER KUMAR VS. UNION BANK OF INDIA [LAWS(P&H)-2022-7-255] [REFERRED TO]
DR. RAJASRI BHATTACHARYYA VS. CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL [LAWS(P&H)-2017-9-251] [REFERRED TO]
ALLEN BERRY AND CO PRIVATE LTD VS. VIVIAN BOSE [LAWS(P&H)-1959-10-23] [REFERRED TO]
SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY VS. J JAYALALITHA [LAWS(MAD)-1993-11-37] [REFERRED TO]
GULABCHAND VS. LAND TRIBUNAL BHALKI [LAWS(KAR)-1976-12-3] [REFERRED TO]
S MUTHUMANICAKAM VS. STATE [LAWS(MAD)-1985-8-3] [REFERRED TO]
NATVARLAL PENUBHAI DECD VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2023-2-1235] [REFERRED TO]
KIRAN DEVI (PRESIDENT, MAHALAXMI MAHILA VIKAS SAMITI) VS. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND & OTHERS [LAWS(JHAR)-2015-10-177] [REFERRED TO]
JAGRAM VERMA VS. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH [LAWS(MPH)-2024-3-74] [REFERRED TO]
M GANESA REDDIAR VS. C KRISHNASAMY RAJU [LAWS(MAD)-2008-4-22] [REFERRED TO]
VIJAYALAKSHMI SHANMUGAM VS. CHIEF SECRETARY [LAWS(MAD)-2011-12-52] [REFERRED TO]
JANAK DINKARBHAI DOSHI VS. RUPALBEN JANAKBHAI DOSHI [LAWS(GJH)-2009-11-301] [REFERRED TO]
DHANARAJU V B VS. CAUVERY GRAMEENA BANK [LAWS(KAR)-2001-10-1] [REFERRED TO]
NAGESHWAR VIDHYA TRUST VS. PANKAJBHAI HARISHCHANDRA JANI [LAWS(GJH)-2005-5-48] [REFERRED TO]
VIKRANT YOGENDRA ANAND AND OTHERS VS. DEALER SELECTION BOARD (AHMEDABAD) AND OTHERS [LAWS(GJH)-2005-7-99] [REFERRED TO]
RAMANLAL GOVINDRAM VS. AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION [LAWS(GJH)-1968-11-1] [REFERRED]
MOHD RAFIQ VS. MOHAN LAL [LAWS(J&K)-2008-6-30] [REFERRED TO]
IKRAMUDDIN AND ANR. VS. U.P. INDUSTRIAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. AND ORS. [LAWS(ALL)-1968-1-25] [REFERRED TO]
MAHENDRA KUMAR JAISWAL VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH [LAWS(CHH)-2013-2-21] [REFERRED TO]
MUMTAJ ALI VS. STATE OF ASSAM [LAWS(GAU)-2005-12-13] [REFERRED TO]
SATYA MEGHA INDUSTRIES (M/S) AND ANR. VS. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND ORS. [LAWS(GAU)-2018-1-112] [REFERRED TO]
SK GOLAP VS. BHUBAN CHANDRA PANDA [LAWS(CAL)-1990-11-29] [REFERRED TO]
G S CHERRA VS. HINDUSTAN STEELWORKS CONSTRUCTION LIMITED [LAWS(CAL)-1995-1-1] [REFERRED TO]
CHANDRA BHAN AND PARASHU RAM, BOTH SONS OF PALKI VS. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION AND ORS. [LAWS(ALL)-2005-12-275] [REFERRED TO]
K.K. AZAD VS. UNIVERSITY OF ALLAHABAD [LAWS(ALL)-1995-5-132] [REFERRED TO]
BAJRANG PRASAD SRIVASTAVA VS. U P PARIYOJANA PRABANDHAK [LAWS(ALL)-2000-5-36] [REFERRED TO]
WAINGANGA BAHUUDDESHIYA VIKAS SANSTHA VS. ANIL [LAWS(BOM)-2011-9-22] [REFERRED TO]
KINRI DHIR VS. VEER SINGH [LAWS(DLH)-2022-4-157] [REFERRED TO]
PATENT AND TRADE MARK AGENCIES EMPLOYEES UNION VS. WILLIAM FREDERIC DE PENNING [LAWS(CAL)-1963-7-7] [REFERRED TO]
MAHENDER YADAV VS. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION [LAWS(DLH)-2016-11-3] [REFERRED TO]
GURUDAS BISWAS VS. SIBASANKAR SEAL [LAWS(CAL)-1974-7-10] [REFERRED TO]
I V R CONSTRUCTIONS LIMITED VS. SUKDEVRAJ SHARMA AND BROS [LAWS(APH)-1998-9-21] [REFERRED TO]
HARENDRA NATH BOSE VS. JUDGE 2ND INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL [LAWS(CAL)-1957-11-6] [REFERRED TO]
SHEW SAKTI OIL MILLS LTD VS. JUDGE SECOND INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL [LAWS(CAL)-1960-1-3] [REFERRED TO]
M THAHA VS. DIRECTOR GENERAL NIRD [LAWS(APH)-1992-1-6] [REFERRED TO]
M GANGAPPA VS. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [LAWS(APH)-1973-10-6] [REFERRED TO]
ARWACHIN BHARTI BHAWAN SCHOOL VS. DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATIONA [LAWS(DLH)-2000-3-9] [REFERRED]
H K L BHAGAT VS. STATE [LAWS(DLH)-1996-5-75] [REFERRED TO]
ASHOK RANKA VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. [LAWS(RAJ)-2015-12-113] [REFERRED TO]
REVENUE BAR ASSOCIATION VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(MAD)-2019-9-80] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF PUNJAB VS. DAVINDER PAL SINGH BHULLAR [LAWS(SC)-2011-12-10] [REFERRED TO]
N K BAJPAI VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(SC)-2012-3-43] [REFERRED TO]
BABULAL BADRIPRASAD VARMA VS. SURAT MUNICIPAL CORPORATION [LAWS(SC)-2008-5-215] [RELIED ON]
MOHAN LAL AGGRAWAL VS. BHUBANESWARI PRASAD MISHRA [LAWS(SC)-2001-9-25] [REFERRED]
DAVINDER SINGH AND AMAR SINGH AND ANR. VS. DEPUTY SECRETARY CUM SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER AND ORS. [LAWS(P&H)-1964-2-25] [REFERRED TO]
USHA BELTRON LTD VS. BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD [LAWS(PAT)-2000-7-45] [REFERRED TO]
SUNIL TUDU VS. STATE OF JHARKHAND [LAWS(JHAR)-2024-4-25] [REFERRED TO]
PARTH RASAYAN PVT LTD VS. STATE APPELLATE FORUM [LAWS(MPH)-2004-9-50] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH VS. VAYAM TECHNOLOGIES LTD [LAWS(MPH)-2014-4-27] [REFERRED TO]
M S POOJARI VS. REGISTRAR GENERAL HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA [LAWS(KAR)-2010-3-73] [REFERRED TO]
AMUMIYAN PIRMIYAN KADRI VS. GUJARAT STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION [LAWS(GJH)-1991-12-12] [REFERRED TO]
PARMANAND G MAKHIJA DR VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-1981-3-24] [REFERRED]
STATE VS. JANAMOHAN DAS [LAWS(ORI)-1993-1-12] [REFERRED TO]
SRI JENAMANI SHAILENDRA KR. RAY VS. ORISSA STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND 2 ORS. [LAWS(ORI)-2008-9-97] [REFERRED TO]
M MADHAVAN PILLAI VS. K A BALAN [LAWS(KER)-1978-12-22] [REFERRED TO]
REV. FR. PUNNEN THOMAS VS. MORAN MAR BASSALIOS [LAWS(KER)-1963-1-47] [REFERRED TO]
M GOPALAKRISHNAN VS. INSPECTOR OF POLICE [LAWS(MAD)-2009-8-281] [REFERRED TO]
M S KARUPPUSWAMY VS. GANDHIGRAM RURAL INSTITUTE [LAWS(MAD)-2010-4-612] [REFERRED TO]
N SUBRAMANIAN VS. DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATIONAL OFFICER [LAWS(MAD)-2010-6-242] [REFERRED TO]
M N SRINIVASAN VS. ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF SUGAR CHENNAI [LAWS(MAD)-2011-12-9] [REFERRED TO]
FAROOQ AHMAD BANDEY VS. PRINCIPAL, REGIONAL ENGINEERING COLLEGE [LAWS(J&K)-1975-9-1] [REFERRED TO]
ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS VS. SOHANLAL BAHL [LAWS(CAL)-1964-11-1] [REFERRED TO]
STANDARD LITERATURE CO PRIVATE LTD VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(CAL)-1967-4-13] [REFERRED TO]
NAGPUR IMPROVEMENT TRUST VS. JAIN KALAR SAMAJ [LAWS(BOM)-2024-10-56] [REFERRED TO]
N. S. NAGALAKSHMI VS. VIDYA VARDHAKA SANGHA [LAWS(KAR)-2021-1-111] [REFERRED TO]
SIDDIVINAYAK REALTIES PRIVET LTD VS. TULIP HOSPITALITY SERVICES LIMITED [LAWS(BOM)-2006-9-86] [REFERRED TO]
SHRI MARIO COTTA PEREIRA KURTAKRAR REAL ESTATE VS. GORAKSHAWADI SHANTINAGAR GRAM VIKAS SAMITTEE [LAWS(BOM)-2007-3-22] [REFERRED TO]
DEBI SINGH AND ORS. VS. DY. DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION AND ORS. [LAWS(ALL)-1960-2-21] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH VS. SUBHASH PROJECTS AND MARKETING LTD [LAWS(GAU)-2006-7-3] [REFERRED TO]
SQN. LDR GYAN PRAKASH NARAYAN GUPTA VS. UNION OF INDIA (UOI) AND THREE ORS. [LAWS(GAU)-1995-3-39] [REFERRED TO]
MS. USHA BHANDARI VS. NEW GREEN FIELD SCHOOL & ORS. [LAWS(DLH)-2013-2-392] [REFERRED TO]
MAHESH GUPTA VS. STATE OF H.P. [LAWS(HPH)-2011-7-53] [REFERRED TO]
P V S V PRASADA RAO VS. ANDHRA UNIVERSITY [LAWS(APH)-2005-12-1] [REFERRED TO]
KHITISH CHANDRA RABIDAS VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(CAL)-2004-9-3] [REFERRED TO]
ALI MAKIN NAQVI VS. U P SHIYA CENTRAL BOARD OF WAKF [LAWS(ALL)-2008-6-53] [REFERRED TO]
PROFESSOR G K RAI VS. CHANCELLOR UNIVERSITY OF ALLAHABAD [LAWS(ALL)-2004-5-67] [REFERRED TO]
SANJAY KUMAR PHILIP VS. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 ORS. [LAWS(ALL)-2020-1-483] [REFERRED TO]
THE MANAGING COMMITTEE VIDYA BHAWAN MAHAVIDYALAYA (SECONDARY SCHOOL) VS. DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION [LAWS(DLH)-2006-3-274] [REFERRED TO]
RAM BILAS VS. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH [LAWS(ALL)-1989-5-38] [REFERRED TO]
CHANDRA KUMAR CHOPRA VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(SC)-2012-5-31] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF U P VS. SHEO SHANKER LAL SRIVASTAVA [LAWS(SC)-2006-2-53] [REFERRED TO]
BAREJA AUTOMOBILES PVT LTD VS. STATE OF HARYANA [LAWS(P&H)-2012-8-37] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND VS. KESHAVANAND JHALDIYAL [LAWS(UTN)-2014-9-25] [REFERRED TO]
NACHHATTER SINGH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS [LAWS(P&H)-2015-7-433] [REFERRED]
DEV SINGH AND ORS. VS. THE REGISTRAR, PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AND ORS. [LAWS(P&H)-1996-2-196] [REFERRED TO]
NARESH BHANSALI VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [LAWS(RAJ)-2000-8-39] [REFERRED TO]
COMMERCIAL TAXES BAR ASSOCIATION VS. STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2017-2-127] [REFERRED TO]
ZAHEERABEE VS. LAND TRIBUNAL [LAWS(KAR)-2012-11-66] [REFERRED TO]
PHILIPPOSE MAR THEOPHILUS VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-1986-10-65] [REFERRED TO]
PHILIPS INDIA LIMITED VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [LAWS(KAR)-2022-7-884] [REFERRED TO]
A ABINASH VS. COMMISSIONER OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION [LAWS(MAD)-2010-8-9] [FOLLOWED ON]
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF KPT & 1 ANR VS. NEW KANDLA SALT & CHEMICAL PVT LTD & 1 ANR [LAWS(GJH)-2013-12-316] [REFERRED TO]
MANUBHAI PARAGJI VASHI VS. UNIVERSITY OF BOMBAY [LAWS(BOM)-1993-1-36] [REFERRED TO]
KUMKUM PRAKASHAN VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-1989-2-4] [RELIED ON]
BALDEV SHARMA VS. REGISTRAR CO OP SOCIETIES [LAWS(J&K)-2001-12-3] [REFERRED TO]
B N SINHA VS. MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA [LAWS(DLH)-1969-11-3] [REFERRED TO]
SHAMSHER RAI VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-1982-7-30] [REFERRED TO]
Goa Urban Co operative Bank LTD VS. Avelino Noronha AND Sons [LAWS(BOM)-2004-4-114] [REFERRED TO]
J. MADHUSUDHAN REDDY VS. GOVERNMENT OF A.P. [LAWS(APH)-2014-4-47] [REFERRED TO]
Y S VIJAYA VS. UNION OF INDIA REP BY ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HOME SHASTRI BHAVAN NEW DELHI [LAWS(APH)-2012-2-48] [REFERRED TO]
LATIKA CO OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD VS. COMMISSIONER CORPORATION OF CALCUTTA [LAWS(CAL)-1979-4-5] [REFERRED TO]
GALI MUDDU KRISHNAM NAIDU M L A PUTTUR CHITTOOR DISTRICT VS. GOVERNMENT OF A P [LAWS(APH)-1994-10-11] [REFERRED TO]
RAJ KUMARI KHARBANDA VS. THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ETC. [LAWS(HPH)-1974-10-13] [REFERRED TO]
BALWANT RAI MAHAJAN VS. V.P. KHOSLA, DEPTY CONTROLLER (FORMS) AND ORS. [LAWS(HPH)-1978-9-7] [REFERRED TO]
RAJINDER SINGH ALIAS MANU VS. STATE OF W B [LAWS(CAL)-2004-5-27] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. TRILOKI NATH PANDEY H C C P 232 [LAWS(ALL)-2004-12-201] [REFERRED TO]
NANUKI PRASAD VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(GJH)-2018-9-187] [REFERRED TO]
BHAVNEETA RAJESHKUMAR DARJI VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2018-3-5] [REFERRED TO]
DIVYA CHANDRA VS. VICE CHANCELLOR ROORKEE UNIVERSITY ROORKEE [LAWS(ALL)-1992-2-30] [REFERRED TO]
LALIT KUMAR MODI VS. BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET IN INDIA [LAWS(BOM)-2010-9-141] [REFERRED TO]
ADVANI BUILDERS PVT LTD VS. SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY [LAWS(BOM)-2012-3-107] [REFERRED TO]
TRILOK SUDHIRBHAI PANDYA VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(SC)-2011-10-30] [REFERRED TO]
DIBYA GURUNG VS. STATE OF SIKKIM [LAWS(SIK)-2018-4-5] [REFERRED TO]
UMED HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL JODHPUR VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [LAWS(RAJ)-1999-4-30] [REFERRED 38]
SATISH BABUSENAN VS. CHAIRMAN,KERALA STATE CHALACHITHRA ACADEMY [LAWS(KER)-2020-10-241] [REFERRED TO]
ANGELA RANGAD VS. STATE OF MEGHALAYA [LAWS(MEGH)-2013-5-12] [REFERRED TO]
DILIP KUMAR VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(KAR)-2015-1-411] [REFERRED TO]
DR. A.K. BAKHSHI VS. PANJAB UNIVERSITY AND ORS. [LAWS(P&H)-1999-12-139] [REFERRED TO]
LALIT DAVE VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. [LAWS(RAJ)-2010-11-84] [REFERRED TO]
ARUN KUMAR SHARMA AND 66 ORS. VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. [LAWS(RAJ)-2010-11-199] [REFERRED TO]
RAJAPPA MENON VS. UNION GOVERNMENT RAILWAY ADMINISTRATION [LAWS(KER)-1964-7-10] [REFERRED TO]
JEEVA PANDIAN VS. M IYYASWAMY THEVAR [LAWS(MAD)-1987-9-12] [REFERRED TO]
G SURYANARAYANA RAJU VS. GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU [LAWS(MAD)-1990-3-48] [REFERRED TO]
PRAMOD KUMAR VS. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND [LAWS(JHAR)-2015-10-172] [REFERRED TO]
SYEDA AFSHANA BHAT VS. UNIVERSITY OF KASHMIR [LAWS(J&K)-2022-9-69] [REFERRED TO]
SUMINDRA PRASAD SINGH VS. COMMANDANT, C. I. S. F. [LAWS(KER)-1995-8-42] [REFERRED TO]
SAJI VS. DISTRICT COURT [LAWS(KER)-1999-12-7] [REFERRED TO]
AADYAARUSH POWER PROJECTS PVT. LTD. VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [LAWS(KAR)-2021-9-55] [REFERRED TO]
LAMA NGAWANG NORBU VS. STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH [LAWS(GAU)-2018-8-130] [REFERRED TO]
JITENDER GULERIA VS. HIMACHAL PRADESH VIDHAN SABHA [LAWS(HPH)-2017-8-12] [REFERRED TO]
KITIKU IMPORTS TRADE PRIVATE LIMITED VS. SAVITRI METALS LIMITED [LAWS(BOM)-1998-5-15] [REFERRED TO]
SANSAR CHAND VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(HPH)-1980-9-12] [REFERRED TO]
NOBLE ENGINEERING WORKS VS. H P STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD [LAWS(HPH)-1993-12-2] [REFERRED TO]
KALIPADA ROY VS. DISTRICT CONTROLLER FOOD AND SUPPLIES HOOGHLY [LAWS(CAL)-1983-8-22] [REFERRED TO]
PURNENDU KISHORE CHAKRAVORTY VS. RASOMAY GANGULY [LAWS(CAL)-1980-2-5] [REFERRED TO]
KUNAL SAHA VS. WEST BENGAL MEDICAL COUNCIL [LAWS(CAL)-2003-4-1] [REFERRED TO]
CHANDRAKANT DAYALJI PATEL VS. JAYANT SANGHVI [LAWS(GJH)-2014-8-35] [REFERRED TO]
EHTESHAM ULLAH KHAN VS. CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL [LAWS(ALL)-2003-5-118] [REFERRED TO]
RAJVIR SINGH VS. COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT, KISAN DEGREE COLLEGE, SIMBHAOLI & OTHERS [LAWS(ALL)-2006-1-308] [REFERRED TO]
TARUN KATARIA VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(DLH)-2024-2-331] [REFERRED TO]
PALRIWALA BROTHERS LIMITED VS. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS [LAWS(CAL)-1961-6-34] [REFERRED]
K VIJAYA BHASKAR REDDY VS. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [LAWS(APH)-1995-9-15] [REFERRED TO]
M/S. PERNOD RICARD INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED VS. STATE OF GOA [LAWS(BOM)-2021-4-53] [REFERRED TO]
IN RE, MALEPATI SRIHARI RAO VS. STATE [LAWS(APH)-1962-1-32] [REFERRED TO]
M ARIFFUDDIN NIZAMI VS. D D CHITALE [LAWS(APH)-1972-8-7] [REFERRED TO]
R C PARTI VS. INDIAN AIRLINES CORPORATION [LAWS(DLH)-1995-8-13] [REFERRED TO]
MADHU RANI VS. ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY AND ORS. [LAWS(ALL)-2016-4-47] [REFERRED TO]
IN RE: RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL, ADVOCATE VS. STATE [LAWS(SC)-2013-8-84] [REFERRED TO]
KALPANA RANI VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2014-5-22] [REFERRED TO]
SUPERINTENDENT, KALIYAR ESTATE, KERALA VS. O. KURIAKKO AND ANOTHER [LAWS(KER)-1970-12-33] [REFERRED TO]
HERO CYCLES LIMITED VS. INTERNATIONAL CYCLE AND STRIPS LIMITED LUDHIANA [LAWS(P&H)-1999-5-34] [REFERRED TO]
KALPRAJ DHARAMSHI VS. KOTAK INVESTMENT ADVISORS LIMITED [LAWS(SC)-2021-3-36] [REFERRED TO]
ASHOK KUMAR JAIN & ORS. VS. RAJASTHAN FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND OTHERS [LAWS(RAJ)-1998-1-82] [REFERRED TO]
BABU RAM VS. STATE OF HARYANA [LAWS(P&H)-1994-4-33] [REFERRED TO]
RATTAN LAL SHARMA VS. MANAGING COMMITTEE DR HARI RAM CO EDUCATION HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL [LAWS(SC)-1993-5-3] [RELIED ON]
G SARANA VS. UNIVERSITY OF LUCKNOW [LAWS(SC)-1976-7-3] [FOLLOWED 1957 SCR 575 :]
SAJJAN SINGH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [LAWS(P&H)-2015-3-485] [REFERRED TO]
RAMESHWAR SINGH VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(MPH)-1962-3-8] [REFERRED TO]
KAMPHER MARK SWER VS. STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ORS. [LAWS(MEGH)-2015-8-3] [REFERRED TO]
Surendra Prasad Mishra VS. Kanhai Ram [LAWS(MPH)-1998-1-59] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF PUNJAB VS. CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BENCH AT CHANDIGARH [LAWS(P&H)-2020-11-6] [REFERRED TO]
SATUBHA K VAGHELA VS. MOOSA RAZA THE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER AHMEDABAD [LAWS(GJH)-1968-2-5] [REFERRED]
KAUSHIK SHUKLAL JAIN VS. I O C [LAWS(GJH)-2005-4-107] [REFERRED TO]
RAVI SHANKAR VS. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND [LAWS(JHAR)-2014-7-106] [REFERRED TO]
S RENGARAJAN VS. SRIRANGAM JANOPAKARA BANK LTD [LAWS(MAD)-1962-7-32] [REFERRED TO]
VALLIMAYIL AMMAL VS. THE COMMISSION OF INQUIRY (THE DISTRICT JUDGE) AND ANR. [LAWS(MAD)-1966-3-37] [REFERRED TO]
R MURALI VS. R KAMALAKKANAN [LAWS(MAD)-1999-10-4] [REFERRED TO]
KUNJAMMAL ALIAS P J ALEYAMMA VS. MARIAMMAL IYPE [LAWS(MAD)-2001-4-6] [REFERRED TO]
T.B. VENUGOPAL VS. THE TUMKUR MILK PRODUCERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES UNION LIMITED [LAWS(KAR)-2021-8-113] [REFERRED TO]
RAM LAKHAN VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER [LAWS(ALL)-1961-9-29] [REFERRED TO]
B.P. MAURYA VS. ELECTION TRIBUNAL AND ORS. [LAWS(ALL)-1963-11-35] [REFERRED TO]
SHAMRAO NARAYAN WANKHEDE VS. MUNICIPAL COUNCIL SAONER [LAWS(BOM)-2002-11-63] [REFERRED TO]
STATE VS. H C SANJIV MALIK [LAWS(DLH)-2019-7-368] [REFERRED TO]
S A HAKEEM VS. N T R UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES [LAWS(APH)-2000-8-74] [REFERRED TO]
ASHISHKUMAR ASHWINKUMAR DARJI VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2018-6-129] [REFERRED TO]
PRAKASH @ PAKO BABUBHAI PATEL VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2017-11-255] [REFERRED TO]
AMAR NATH RANA VS. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [LAWS(HPH)-2012-4-31] [REFERRED TO]
HINDUSTHAN NATIONAL GLASS AND INDUSTRIES LIMITED VS. RESERVE BANK OF INDIA [LAWS(CAL)-2009-9-46] [REFERRED TO]
RAMA KANT SHUKLA VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(DLH)-2014-2-209] [REFERRED TO]
VIRENDRA KUMAR SHARMA VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2006-5-234] [REFERRED TO]
DEEPAK KUMAR SHARMA VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(GAU)-2010-5-34] [REFERRED TO]
M. AMARENDER REDDY VS. CANARA BANK [LAWS(APH)-2016-4-53] [REFERRED TO]
M VIVEKANANDA MURTHY VS. GOVERNMENT OF A P [LAWS(APH)-2008-6-68] [REFERRED TO]
PROF AMAR PRAKASH GARG VS. CHANCELLOR, CHAUDHARY CHARAN SINGH UNIVERSITY, MEERUT [LAWS(ALL)-2015-5-257] [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. B N JHA [LAWS(SC)-2003-3-29] [REFERRED]
EBRAMUSA VS. INDIAN BANK ASSET RECOVERY MANAGEMENT BRANCH [LAWS(MAD)-2019-9-126] [REFERRED TO]
VIPAN KUMAR JAIN VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(P&H)-2001-5-29] [REFERRED TO]
SURINDER SINGH VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(P&H)-2013-2-195] [REFERRED TO]
MY PALACE MUTUALLY AIDED CO­OPERATIVE SOCIETY VS. B. MAHESH [LAWS(SC)-2022-8-68] [REFERRED TO]
CAPSTAN METERS INDIA LIMITED VS. JUDGE LABOUR COURT JAIPUR [LAWS(RAJ)-1991-4-10] [REFERRED TO]
BALVINDER SINGH VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [LAWS(RAJ)-2013-7-62] [REFERRED TO]
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA VS. JAI CHAITANYA DASA AND ORS. [LAWS(KAR)-2015-4-62] [REFERRED TO]
TIFFINS BARYTES VS. C SATYANARAYANA [LAWS(MAD)-2012-6-334] [REFERRED TO]
TATA CELLULAR VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(SC)-1994-7-97] [RELIED ON]
STATE OF WEST BENGAL VS. SHIVANANDA PATHAK [LAWS(SC)-1998-2-85] [RELIED ON]
INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA VS. L K RATNA [LAWS(SC)-1986-10-10] [DISTINGUISHED]
SRIMATI PREMKANTA KUMARI JAIN VS. THE STATE OF BIHAR & OTHERS [LAWS(PAT)-1973-7-19] [REFERRED TO]
Bajaj Electricals Ltd. VS. Nandkishore Kanojia [LAWS(MPH)-1998-10-45] [REFERRED TO]
RAM CHANDRA BHAGWANJI VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2013-9-9] [REFERRED TO]
MAIDAN TOWN VS. STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2017-2-101] [REFERRED TO]
S J SINGH VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-1992-8-4] [REFERRED TO]
BIDYA DEVI VS. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ORS. [LAWS(JHAR)-2015-10-11] [REFERRED TO]
RUPANWITA PANDA VS. STATE OF ORISSA [LAWS(ORI)-2022-5-125] [REFERRED TO]
BHAVIN JITENDRABHAI CHOLERA VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2021-6-335] [REFERRED TO]
MIR IQBAL HUSAIN VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-1963-10-28] [REFERRED TO]
MAHESHKUMAR GORDHANDAS PRAJAPATI VS. GUJARAT PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION [LAWS(GJH)-2020-1-118] [REFERRED TO]
SUSME BUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITED VS. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER [LAWS(BOM)-2012-8-30] [REFERRED TO]
PEMA KHANDU AND ORS. VS. THE SPEAKER AND ORS. [LAWS(GAU)-2016-4-23] [REFERRED TO]
MADAPURAM MADDILETI NAIDU VS. THE STATE OF A.P. [LAWS(APH)-2014-10-29] [REFERRED TO]
D K KHANNA VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(HPH)-1972-10-1] [REFERRED TO]
PHILIPS INDIA LIMITED VS. LD FOURTH INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL WEST BENGAL [LAWS(CAL)-2003-8-64] [REFERRED TO]
COAL MINES OFFICERS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(CAL)-1995-3-11] [REFERRED TO]
RAM PADA NATH VS. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS [LAWS(CAL)-1981-7-64] [REFERRED TO]
SUBAL CHANDRA MALLICK VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [LAWS(CAL)-1987-2-22] [REFERRED TO]
NIYAMAT JAHAN VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2009-8-45] [REFERRED TO]
AMAR SINGH SHRI RAM BHAROSEY LAL VS. DISTRICT JUDGE [LAWS(ALL)-2005-5-249] [REFERRED TO]
THE FINANCIAL TIMES LTD. VS. THE TIMES PUBLISHING HOUSE LTD. [LAWS(DLH)-2016-10-46] [REFERRED TO]
SURRENDER KUMAR VS. UOI & ORS. [LAWS(DLH)-2016-7-253] [REFERRED TO]
RAVI CHANDRA PRAKASH VS. SUPREME COURT OF INDIA AND ANOTHER [LAWS(DLH)-2017-7-344] [REFERRED TO]
RADHIKA CONSTRUCTIONS VS. STATE OF U. P. [LAWS(ALL)-2023-3-123] [REFERRED TO]
GALADA POWER AND TELECOMMUNICATION LTD VS. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD [LAWS(SC)-2016-7-114] [REFERRED TO]
JUSTICE P D DINAKARAN VS. HONBLE JUDGES INQUIRY COMMITTEE [LAWS(SC)-2011-7-22] [REFERRED TO]
LALU PRASAD @ LALU PRASAD YADAV VS. STATE OF JHARKHAND [LAWS(SC)-2013-8-13] [REFERRED TO]
BHARAT RATTAN DR. BABA SAHIB BHIM RAO AMBEDKAR COOPERATIVE TRANSPORT SOCIETY LTD. VS. STATE OF HARYANA [LAWS(P&H)-2005-1-83] [REFERRED TO]
ANIMISH PRADIP RAJE VS. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA [LAWS(TLNG)-2021-8-75] [REFERRED TO]
S MAHADEVAN VS. REGIONAL MANAGER [LAWS(MAD)-2008-9-101] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. MOHAMMAD NOOH [LAWS(SC)-1957-9-19] [REFERRED]
BADRIDASS KANHAIYALAL VS. APPELLATE TRIBUNAL OF STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITYRAJASTHAN [LAWS(RAJ)-1959-4-15] [REFERRED TO]
R K VYAS VS. M D S UNIVERSITY AJMER [LAWS(RAJ)-2001-2-44] [REFERRED TO]
PUKH RAJ VS. MAGH RAJ [LAWS(RAJ)-2005-1-10] [REFERRED TO]
R KUMARAVEL VS. TAMIL NADU MARITIME BOARD [LAWS(MAD)-2011-8-247] [REFERRED TO]
JIWAN KUMAR LOHIA VS. DURGADUTT LOHIA [LAWS(SC)-1991-10-62] [RELIED ON]
V N NADGIR VS. UNION OF INDIA BY SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS; NEW DELHI [LAWS(KAR)-1969-7-22] [REFERRED]
RAVI VS. KARNATAKA UNIVERSITY [LAWS(KAR)-2006-7-13] [REFERRED TO]
AMARSINHBHAI BHILABHAI CHAUDHARY VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2000-9-22] [REFERRED TO]
MUKESH RAO VS. HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA [LAWS(P&H)-2012-12-74] [REFERRED TO]
JAGMOHANDAS JAGJIVANDAS MODY VS. STATE OF BOMBAY NOW GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-1961-7-10] [REFERRED]
DHARAMDAS S O MOTUMAL RAJPAL VS. RESIDENT DEPUTY COLLECTOR AMRAVATI [LAWS(BOM)-1996-11-3] [REFERRED TO]
MARIO COTTA PEREIRA VS. GORAKSHAWADI SHANTINAGAR GRAM VIKAS SAMIITTEE [LAWS(BOM)-2007-3-161] [REFERRED TO]
CHAMBA SINGH VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-1973-2-21] [REFERRED TO]
GURU GHASIDAS SAHITYA AVAM SANSKRITI ACADEMY VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH [LAWS(CHH)-2022-9-64] [REFERRED TO]
P R NAYAK VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(DLH)-1973-1-28] [REFERRED]
RAM MOHAN BASU VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [LAWS(CAL)-1957-5-15] [REFERRED TO]
SURENDRA KUMAR RAY CHOUDHURY VS. COLLECTOR OF CALCUTTA [LAWS(CAL)-1977-1-40] [REFERRED TO]
VIRAJ CHETAN SHAH VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(BOM)-2024-4-129] [REFERRED TO]
B RAJA GOPAL VS. GENERAL MANAGER NIZAM SUGAR FACTORY LTD [LAWS(APH)-1995-11-49] [REFERRED TO]
PALAKURTI VENKATA RAO VS. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH [LAWS(APH)-1959-3-10] [REFERRED TO]
MUKESH THAKUR VS. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [LAWS(HPH)-2020-11-51] [REFERRED TO]
RASHTRIYA ISPAT NIGAM LTD. VS. SPACE TECH EQUIPMENTS AND STRUCTURALS [LAWS(APH)-2020-5-61] [REFERRED TO]
NOBLE ENGINEERING WORKS ETC. VS. H.P. STATE ELECTRICITY [LAWS(HPH)-1993-12-14] [REFERRED TO]
UMESH CHAND BHILWAR VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-1998-11-111] [REFERRED TO]
KM DIVYA CHANDRA VS. VICE-CHANCELLOR ROORKEE UNIVERSITY ROORKEE [LAWS(ALL)-1992-2-76] [REFERRED TO]
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK VS. R.P. PUSHKAR [LAWS(DLH)-2011-5-479] [REFERRED TO]
GUJARAT STATE COOPERATIVE MARKETING FEDERATION LTD. AND 1 VS. STATE OF GUJARAT AND 2 [LAWS(GJH)-2017-4-475] [REFERRED TO]
CHAUDHARY RAMESHBHAI DEVJIBHAI VS. AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION [LAWS(GJH)-2019-3-30] [REFERRED TO]
HIMANSHU SINGH SABHARWAL VS. STATE OF M P [LAWS(SC)-2008-3-142] [REFERRED TO]
MADHU BAHUGUNA VS. UTTARAKHAND PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION [LAWS(UTN)-2020-1-63] [REFERRED TO]
R YISWANATHAN RUKN UL MULK SYED ABDUL WAJID R GAJAMBAL AMMAL RUKN UL MULK SYED ABDUL WAJID RUKN UL MULK SYED ABDUL WAJID VS. RUKN UL MULK SYED ABDUL WAJID:R YISWANATHAN:RUKN UL MULK SYED ABDUL WAJID:R GAJAMBAL AMMAL:V GAJAMBAL AMMAL [LAWS(SC)-1962-5-1] [RELIED ON]
DR. LOVEKESH KUMAR AND OTHERS VS. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS [LAWS(P&H)-1998-1-238] [REFERRED TO]
S D BALASUBRAMANIAM VS. DIRECTOR OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY SERVICES CENTRAL OFFICE BUILDINGS [LAWS(MAD)-2009-7-593] [REFERRED TO]
KHANDAN KUMAR DAS VS. STATE OF ASSAM [LAWS(GAU)-2021-8-36] [REFERRED TO]
P V JOJO S/O VAREED VS. INDIA CEMENTS CAPITAL & FINANCE LTD [LAWS(KER)-2019-1-75] [REFERRED TO]
JAGATJIT COTTON TEXTILE MILLS LTD VS. INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL PATIALA [LAWS(P&H)-1959-3-12] [REFERRED TO]
MESSRS. J.B. MANGHARAM & CO., HYDERABAD VS. SHRI PARSHOTAM SARUP, DEPUTY CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, NEW DELHI AND OTHERS [LAWS(P&H)-1962-5-28] [REFERRED TO]
DIWAN ISHWAR DASS AND ORS. VS. THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. [LAWS(P&H)-1968-9-33] [REFERRED TO]
SOHAN LAL VS. STATE OF HARYANA [LAWS(P&H)-1981-4-12] [REFERRED TO]
SIDDHARTH SHARMA VS. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH [LAWS(HPH)-2022-3-83] [REFERRED TO]
S P THIYAGARAJAN PROF IN MICROBIOLOGY POST GRADUATE INSTITUTE OF BASIC MEDICAL SCIENCE TARAMANI VS. DR T SUNDARARAJ READER IN MICROBIOLOGY POST GRADUATE INSTITUTE OF BASIC MEDICAL SCIENCE [LAWS(MAD)-2000-4-106] [REFERRED TO]
S P SHENBAGAMOORTHY VS. MU KA STALIN [LAWS(MAD)-2002-7-67] [REFERRED TO]
R P SINGH VSM VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(DLH)-2002-5-169] [REFERRED TO]
RAMESH RAI VS. CHAIRMAN S K G BANK [LAWS(ALL)-2005-2-188] [REFERRED TO]
HIRALAL SHAH VS. STATE OF ASSAM & ORS. [LAWS(CAL)-1983-9-37] [REFERRED TO]
NIAZ AHMAD VS. VIIITH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE U P ALIGARH [LAWS(ALL)-1997-1-24] [REFERRED TO]
SHARVAN DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED VS. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI [LAWS(BOM)-2011-12-9] [REFERRED TO]
COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION VS. STATE OF DELHI [LAWS(DLH)-2007-10-24] [REFERRED TO]
GURUDAS BISWAS VS. CHARU PANNA SEAL [LAWS(CAL)-1974-7-2] [REFERRED TO]
SATYA RANJAN DHAR VS. LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA [LAWS(CAL)-1976-4-18] [REFERRED TO]
PRADEEP SHARMA VS. AAI AND ORS. [LAWS(DLH)-2016-9-136] [REFERRED TO]
S.V. SHARMA VS. DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AND OTHERS [LAWS(DLH)-2017-8-293] [REFERRED TO]
MALEPATI SRIHARI RAO VS. STATE [LAWS(APH)-1963-8-21] [REFERRED TO]
HYDERABAD ALLWYN METAL WORKS LTD VS. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER COMMERCIAL TAXES HYDERABAD DIVISION [LAWS(APH)-1970-12-4] [REFERRED TO]
M CHANDRASEKHARA REDDY VS. DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES [LAWS(APH)-1992-12-35] [REFERRED TO]
G S HARNAL VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(DLH)-1971-5-2] [REFERRED 16.]
K K BIRLA VS. PRESS COUNCIL OF INDIA [LAWS(DLH)-1975-9-23] [REFERRED]
BAIJ NATH SINGH VS. RAM NARAIN SINGH [LAWS(ALL)-1982-5-43] [REFERRED TO]
PEMA KHANDU VS. THE SPEAKER, ARUNACHAL PRADESH LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY [LAWS(GAU)-2016-3-26] [REFERRED TO]
ELVIS STEPHENSON VS. JERUSALEM MATHAI AND ORS. [LAWS(APH)-2015-6-78] [REFERRED TO]
ELVIS STEPHENSON VS. JERUSALEM MATHAI AND ORS. [LAWS(APH)-2015-6-78] [REFERRED TO]
G RAJESHEKAR REDDY VS. STATE OF A P [LAWS(APH)-2005-4-52] [REFERRED TO]
JHV STEEL LTD. VS. STATE OF U. P. [LAWS(ALL)-2023-3-93] [REFERRED TO]
HUSSAIN & ANR VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(CAL)-2015-12-175] [REFERRED]
MOHD SHAFIQ VS. ASSTT DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION [LAWS(ALL)-2011-9-19] [REFERRED TO]
AMAR PRAKASH GARG VS. CHANCELLOR, CHAUDHARY CHARAN SINGH UNIVERSITY MEERUT AND ORS. [LAWS(ALL)-2015-5-453] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)The appellant Shri Manak Lal was an advocate practising at Sojat. A complaint was filed against him under S.13 of the Legal Practitioners Act by Dr. Prem Chand Singhvi. It was alleged that the appellant was guilty of professional misconduct and the complainant requested that suitable action be-taken against him in that behalf. Since the appellant was not a Pleader or a Mukhtear but an advocate of the High Court of Rajasthan the complaint was Sent for enquiry to the tribunal nominated by the Chief Justice of the High Court of Rajasthan under S. 10 (2) of the Bar Councils Act. The tribunal held an enquiry, recorded evidence and came to the unanimous conclusion that the appellant "was guilty of professional misconduct in having got a false stay order written by the clerk by improper means and thereby he managed to take an illegal and undue advantage for his clients and therefore deserves to be punished for, the same." When this report was received by the High Court, the matter was argued before the Court. In the result the High Court agreed with the findings made by the tribunal and directed that the appellant should be removed from practice. It is against this order that by special leave the appellant has come to this Court.
(2.)The facts giving rise to the complaint against the appellant are very few. It appears that there was a dispute concerning Jhalra well and certain agricultural plots surrounding the well between Pukhraj and others on the one hand and Dr. Prem Chand and others on the other. These parties were described in the said proceedings as Party No. 1 and Party No. 2 respectively. The appellant was the counsel for Party No. 1. As a result of this dispute the police presented a report in the court of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sojat that the dispute was likely to cause breach of peace and suggested that proceedings under S.145, Criminal P.C., should be taken. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate drew out a preliminary order on 5th July 1951, (Ex. A-1). By this order both the parties were called upon to put in their written statements as regards their claims to possession of the property in dispute. The learned Magistrate also passed an order attaching the property in dispute pending the decision of the proceedings under S.145. This was followed by another order passed on 9th August 1951, that the crop which was on the field should be auctioned, its price deposited in court and the land itself should be given for cultivation to the highest bidder for the next year. It appears that the hearing of the case was fixed for 21st August 1951. Members of the Party No. 1 were aggrieved by these orders and on their behalf the appellant preferred a revision application against these orders in the court of the Sessions Judge, Pali, on 13th August 1951. The appellant presented another petition before the learned Sessions Judge on 29th August 1951. In this petition it was alleged that the crop which stood on the fields in question belonged to the cultivators described as Party No. 1, that the crop was getting spoiled and that the cultivators would be considerably prejudiced if they were dispossessed from their lands at that stage. On these allegations the application prayed that an order should be passed not to auction the crop as well as the right of future cultivation and that liberty should be given to the cultivators to go to the well and to look after the crop pending the final disposal of their revision application before the learned Sessions Judge. The learned Sessions Judge was not apparently inclined to grant ex parte interim stay and so on the same day he directed that notice of the revision application should be given to the other party and called upon the applicants to furnish talbana and a copy of the application. The case then stood adjourned for hearing on 6th September 1951. On 6th September 1951,when the case was called out before the learned Sessions Judge, the appellant was present. The leaned Session Judge, found that the appellant had not submitted a copy of his application as already directed but he was told that the appellant was submitting a copy on the same day. That is why the learned Judge ordered that notice should be issued after the said copy was filed. The hearing of the case was then adjourned to 12th September 1951. So far there is no dispute about the facts. There is, however, a serious dispute as to other events which, according to the complainant, happened on 6th September 1951. The complainant's case is that, after the hearing of the case was adjourned to 12th September 1951 and notice of the application was ordered to be, issued to Party No. 2, the appellant prevailed upon Shri Meghraj, clerk of the Sessions Judge's Court to prepare an actual stay order, that the said stay order was accordingly prepared and was got signed by the Reader of the Court. Then the appellant obtained the stay order from Shri Sheolal the dispatch clerk to whom it was entrusted by the Reader. Armed with this order the appellant personally took the order to the Sub-Divisional Magistrate and presented it to him the next day. In due course the revision application was taken up for hearing on 12th September 1951. Since no notice had been served on Party No.2 the hearing was again adjourned to 22nd September 1951. It is common ground that on 22nd September 1951, it was discovered that a fraudulent stay order had been issued from the office of the learned Sessions Judge's Court, the learned Sessions Judge then called for explanation from Shri Maghraj and directed the Sub-Divisional Magistrate to treat the letter of 6th September 1951 containing the alleged order of stay as cancelled. It appears that as a result of the enquiry held by the learned Sessions Judge, he found that Shri. Maghraj had committed a grave mistake and held that it would be enough if Shri Maghraj was Fined Rs.11 and administered a severe warning to behave properly in future. The complaint against the appellant is that the appellant took an active part in the commission of the fraud and was thus guilty of fraudulent and grossly improper conduct in the discharge of his professional duty. A false order had been obtained by him by unfair means and so he was guilty of professional misconduct. That in substance is the case against the appellant.
(3.)As we have already indicated, many of the facts alleged in the complaint against the appellant are not in dispute. The appellant admits that he was present before the learned Sessions Judge on 6th September 1951. It is not denied by him that he look the envelope from the dispatch clerk addressed to the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sojat, and that he in fact handed over the envelope the next day in the office of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate. His case, however, is that he never approached Shri Maghraj in this matter and that he was not in any way instrumental in getting the draft prepared. In fact according to the appellant, he did not know the contents of the envelope and it was only on 22nd September 1951 that he knew that a false order of stay had been issued by the office of the Sessions Judge by mistake. Before the tribunal, evidence was led by both the parties. The complainant Dr. Prem Chand himself gave evidence and on his behalf Shri Maghraj and Shri Sheolal were examined. The appellant Manak Lal gave evidence on his behalf. Both the members of the tribunal and the learned Judges of the High Court of Rajasthan have, on the whole, accepted the complainant's version, rejected the pleas raised by the appellant and have held that the appellant is guilty of gross professional misconduct. It is this finding which, on the merits, is challenged before us by Shri C.K. Daphtary on behalf of the appellant. Shri Daphtary has also raised two points of law in support of his argument that the order passed against the appellant must be set aside. It will be convenient to deal with these points first.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.