JUDGEMENT
-
(1.)HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and perused the record of the case.
(2.)IT is contended that The FIR was lodged in the year 2007 and the petitioner was arrested on 25th May, 2008 though he was present in the village and not absconded. It is also contended that the petitioner has not been named in the FIR, thus he has falsely been implicated in the matter. It is further contended that even the case under Section 307 I. P. C. is not made out looking to the injury sustained by the injured.
(3.)LEARNED Public Prosecutor submits that looking to the involvement of the petitioner, he should not be bailed out.
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.