JUDGEMENT
-
(1.)SHRI C.S.Kotwani has lodged caveat on behalf of
the respondent No.1 to oppose admission of this petition
for writ and any orders on stay petition. A copy of the
petition for writ has already been applied to learned
counsel for the caveator.
(2.)HEARD counsel for the parties.
Admit. No need to issue notice as the contesting respondent has already represented by his counsel. Looking
to narrow amplitude of the issue involved the writ petition
is heard today itself with consent of learned counsels.
(3.)BRIEFLY stated, facts of the case are that the respondent No.1 has filed a petition for eviction with
allegation that the tenant in the premises in question has
defaulted in making payment of rent. It is further alleged
that he also renounced the title of landlord.
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.