SONU KUMAR Vs. STATE OF HARYANA
LAWS(P&H)-2021-5-56
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Decided on May 27,2021

SONU KUMAR Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA Respondents


Referred Judgements :-

SHASHI KUMAR VERSUS UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED AND ANOTHER [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. SINGHARA SINGH [REFERRED TO]
HARESH DAYARAM THAKUR VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
DHANANJAYA REDDY VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [REFERRED TO]
JOGINDER SINGH VS. UNION TERRITORY OF CHANDIGARH [REFERRED TO]
BHAG SINGH VS. PUNJAB AND SIND BANK AND ORS. [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA,J. - (1.)Petitioner who was duly selected for the post of Constable, (General Duty) in the Haryana Police Department, has questioned the validity of order dtd. 29/8/2020 (Annexure P-9) whereby offer of appointment to the post has been declined.
(2.)Facts of the case are in a very narrow compass.
Respondents issued advertisement dtd. 16/4/2018 advertising 5000 posts of Male Constables (General Duty). Out of these 900 posts were reserved for the SC Category. Petitioner who belongs to the SC Category applied for the post and subjected himself to a process of selection which also included a written examination. Final merit was determined and result was declared on 28/2/2019. Petitioner secured 52.02 marks whereas the last candidate pertaining to SC Category who has been duly selected and appointed obtained a lower merit position i.e. 51.40 marks.

(3.)It so transpires that at the stage of submitting his application for the post, petitioner had disclosed that he was involved in FIR No.150 dtd. 30/3/2015 under Ss. 323, 452, 506 read with Sec. 34 of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station, Sector 55, Faridabad.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.