VAGICHERIA MURALI KRISHNA Vs. PALLEBOYINA SESHAIAH
LAWS(APH)-2005-8-20
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Decided on August 30,2005

VAGICHERIA MURALI KRISHNA Appellant
VERSUS
PALLEBOYINA SESHAIAH Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.)Revision petitioner's petition seeking eviction of the respondent from a non- residential premises at Kavali was allowed by the Rent Controller but was dismissed by the appellate authority in the appeal preferred by the respondent. Hence this revision by the landlord.
(2.)The admitted facts are, including the premises let out to respondent, petitioner is the owner of four non-residential premises. All of them are in the occupation of tenants. Revision petitioner sought eviction of the respondent on the ground that he requires it for his business he intends to carry on in fancy goods and stainless steelware.
(3.)The case of the respondent is that the requirement, of the revision petitioner, of the building in his occupation is not bona fide and is only intended to seek enhancement in the rent.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.