JUDGEMENT
-
(1.)HEARD the learned advocate for the applicants and the learned A.P.P. for
the State in all the three applications and these three applications are
being disposed of by common order as they arise out of same CR.
(2.)THE applicants are seeking anticipatory bail in C.R.No.33 of 2007 of Radhanagari Police Station. The said case is mainly under Section 3(1)(x)
of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention) of Atrocities
Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Atrocities Act").
It is the prosecution case that the present applicants entered into house of the complainant and abused her in such a manner that it
attracted Section 3(1)(x) of the Atrocities Act. It is an admitted fact
that the incident took place inside the house of the complainant. To
attract provisions of Section 3(1)(x) of the Atrocities Act, offence has
to take place in any place within "public view". As the incident has
taken place inside the house of the complainant, it cannot be said that
it has taken place in "public view", hence, I am inclined to grant
anticipatory bail to the applicants.
(3.)EACH of the applicants i.e. Applicant-Avinash Dagdu Tadule in Cri. Application No.1945 of 2007, Applicant-Dhanaji Dagdu Tadule in Cri.
Application No.1946 of 2007 and Applicant-Deelip Vitthal Telvi in Cri.
Application No.1947 of 2007 to be released on bail in the sum of
Rs.15,000.00 (Rs.fifteen thousand only) each with one or two sureties to
make up the said amount in connection with C.R.No.33 of 2007 of
Radhanagari Police Station. The applicants shall report to the concerned
Police Station twice a week till charge sheet is filed and thereafter
once in a month till the conclusion of trial.
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.