JUDGEMENT
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J. -
(1.)ON the previous date of 22nd April, 2013, the following order was made in the suit: -
1. The suit is ripe for framing of issues.
(2.)NEITHER counsels have submitted proposed issues.
However, the counsel for the plaintiff states that no issue arises. He states that the present suit is for partition of an immovable property admittedly in the name of the plaintiff and the defendant, and the only defense of the defendant is that the entire purchase consideration had flown from the defendant and the plaintiff has not contributed any part of the sale consideration inspite of promise to do so and upon the plaintiff having failed to pay the purchase consideration, had agreed to the defendant alone being the owner of the property.
(3.)IT has been enquired from the counsel for the defendant whether the aforesaid amounts to a defense in law. He has not been able to argue.
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.