PRATAP CHANDA SHEO NARAIN Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
LAWS(SC)-1996-2-1
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: RAJASTHAN)
Decided on February 27,1996

PRATAP,CHANDA,SHEO NARAIN Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF RAJASTHAN Respondents





Cited Judgements :-

AJAY PAL SINGH AND ORS. VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. [LAWS(RAJ)-2015-8-77] [REFERRED TO]
URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST BIKANER VS. GORDHAN DASS [LAWS(RAJ)-2010-1-9] [REFERRED TO]
GAMANBHAI LALLUBHAI PATEL VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2013-10-64] [REFERRED TO]
BALDEV SINGH DHILLION VS. U O I [LAWS(DLH)-2005-5-137] [REFERRED TO]
ASHA RAM VS. PRAMUKH SACHIV AVAS EVAM SHASTRI NIY. LKO. [LAWS(ALL)-2014-2-55] [REFERRED TO]
MANPAL SINGH VS. STATE OF U.P. & 2 OTHERS [LAWS(ALL)-2017-3-39] [REFERRED TO]
V CHANDRASEKARAN VS. ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER [LAWS(SC)-2012-9-27] [REFERRED TO]
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. R HANUMAIAH [LAWS(SC)-2005-10-105] [REFERRED TO]
SEHDEV SINGH VS. STATE OF HARYANA [LAWS(P&H)-2020-5-114] [REFERRED TO]
MAGANBHAI SOMABHAI PATEL VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2013-10-338] [REFERRED TO]
ABDUL SALAM VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2007-11-107] [REFERRED TO]
INVESTMENT CORPORATION PVT. LTD. VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [LAWS(RAJ)-2017-7-304] [REFERRED TO]
SANJAY TYAGI VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [LAWS(RAJ)-2010-10-51] [REFERRED TO]
J. VENKATESH REDDY VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS [LAWS(KAR)-2017-4-16] [REFERRED TO]
VIRENDRA SINGH VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS [LAWS(RAJ)-2016-2-111] [REFERRED TO]
SWAIKA PROPERTIES LTD VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [LAWS(RAJ)-2006-9-25] [REFERRED TO]
WAIROKPAM SAGORCHANDRA SINGH VS. STATE OF MANIPUR [LAWS(GAU)-1997-11-26] [REFERRED TO]
TALVINDAR SINGH AND ANOTHER VS. STATE OF U P AND 2 OTHERS [LAWS(ALL)-2018-2-259] [REFERRED TO]
PREM LATA NIGAM VS. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY [LAWS(ALL)-2017-7-69] [REFERRED TO]
GANSHYAMBHAI BHIKHABHAI MISTRY VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2012-10-277] [REFERRED TO]
K JEGANATHAN VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(MAD)-2008-4-55] [REFERRED TO]
URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST VS. VIDHYA DEVI [LAWS(SC)-2024-12-39] [REFERRED TO]
RANJIT SINGH MEENA VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY [LAWS(RAJ)-2017-4-10] [REFERRED TO]
GANESH PRASAD VS. L D A LUCKNOW [LAWS(ALL)-2011-10-49] [REFERRED TO]
ANIL KUMAR VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2008-3-81] [REFERRED TO]
PATEL KETUMAN NATVARBHAI VS. SECRETARY - REVENUE DEPARTMENT [LAWS(GJH)-2016-5-11] [REFERRED TO]
LIQUIDATOR PETROFILS CO OPERATIVE LTD VS. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF INDIA LTD [LAWS(GJH)-2015-5-36] [REFERRED TO]
HAJIBHAI AIYUBBHAI VS. STATE OF GUJARAT & OTHERS [LAWS(GJH)-2015-3-430] [REFERRED]
K. Balakrishna and another VS. State of Karnataka and others [LAWS(KAR)-2002-3-60] [REFERRED TO]
JOGINDER SINGH VS. CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION [LAWS(P&H)-2010-2-198] [REFERRED TO]
JOGINDER KAUR AND ORS VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS [LAWS(P&H)-2010-4-399] [REFERRED]
THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, KIADB, MYSORE & ANR. VS. ANASUYA BAI (D) BY LRS. & ORS. [LAWS(SC)-2017-1-67] [REFERRED TO]
SWAIKA PROPERTIES PVT LTD VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [LAWS(RAJ)-2006-1-100] [REFERRED TO]
JIVANBHAI SOMABHAI PATEL VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2013-10-65] [REFERRED TO]
BALDEV SINGH DHILLION VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(DLH)-2005-5-165] [REFERRED TO]
E ANJANAPPA VS. STATE OF A P [LAWS(APH)-1996-6-88] [REFERRED TO]
JALADI SITA RAMA KOTESWARA RAO VS. GOVT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [LAWS(APH)-1998-9-26] [REFERRED TO]
SMS INVESTMENT CORPORATION PVT. LTD. VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [LAWS(RAJ)-2017-7-84] [REFERRED TO]
JAWAHAR LAL SON OF SAMPAT LAL, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, BY CASTE JAIN, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA NIMDA GATE, BHARATPUR VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGH SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF RAJASTHAN SECRETARIAT, BHAGWAN DAS ROAD, JAIPUR [LAWS(RAJ)-2016-10-36] [REFERRED TO]
JAGTAR SINGH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [LAWS(P&H)-2012-2-4] [REFERRED TO]
MAGANBHAI BABAR BHAI AHIR VS. STATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS [LAWS(GJH)-2013-10-395] [REFERRED]
KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [LAWS(KAR)-2020-12-166] [REFERRED TO]
PREMAKALA PRABHAKARA REDDY VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [LAWS(KAR)-2019-3-336] [REFERRED TO]
SRI RAM VS. CHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR, UTTAR PRADESH POWER CORPORATION LTD. AND ORS. [LAWS(ALL)-2015-12-152] [REFERRED TO]
BALDEV SINGH DHILLON VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(DLH)-1996-9-35] [REFERRED TO]
LAL CHAND LOHIA AND ORS. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. [LAWS(P&H)-2015-8-131] [REFERRED TO]
TEJ SINGH VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [LAWS(RAJ)-2018-4-295] [REFERRED TO]
JOGINDER SINGH VS. CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION [LAWS(P&H)-2010-6-30] [REFERRED TO]
COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION VS. R.N. PRASHAR [LAWS(P&H)-2010-10-196] [REFERRED TO]
KISHAN LAL SAINI & OTHERS VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & OTHERS [LAWS(RAJ)-2013-4-198] [REFERRED]
PRAKASHI DEVI VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2021-1-206] [REFERRED TO]
S.K. MEHROTRA VS. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY [LAWS(ALL)-2017-5-42] [REFERRED TO]
RADHEY SHYAM VS. STATE OF U.P. [LAWS(ALL)-2017-7-77] [REFERRED TO]
VASUDEV KANCHANLAL PANDYA VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2017-6-355] [REFERRED TO]
JIBAN KUMAR GHOSH & ORS. VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. [LAWS(CAL)-2009-6-73] [REFERRED TO]
BANDA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. MOTI LAL AGARWAL [LAWS(SC)-2011-4-105] [REFERRED TO]
DELHI AIRTECH SERVICES PVT LTD VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(SC)-2011-8-49] [REFERRED TO]
GURKIRPAL SINGH VS. FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER [LAWS(P&H)-2008-5-102] [REFERRED TO]
INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. MANOHARLAL ETC. [LAWS(SC)-2020-3-83] [REFERRED TO]
BHARAT BHAWAN NIRMAN SAHKARI SAMITI LTD. VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPTT. OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING, SECRETARIAT, JAIPUR [LAWS(RAJ)-2017-5-216] [REFERRED TO]
SUBHASH KUMAR GUPTA S/O LATE SHRI SHARWAN LAL JI PANSARI VS. SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NEEM KA THANA, DISTRICT SIKAR [LAWS(RAJ)-2017-3-49] [REFERRED TO]
C KRISHNAN VS. DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER [LAWS(MAD)-2008-5-12] [REFERRED TO]
J JAYARAMAN VS. DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATIONAL [LAWS(MAD)-2008-6-196] [REFERRED TO]
M. SIDDIQI AND ORS. VS. KOLKATA METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS. [LAWS(CAL)-2014-7-147] [REFERRED TO]
H A BALAJI VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [LAWS(KAR)-2011-3-3] [REFERRED TO]
K BALAKRISHNA VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [LAWS(KAR)-2002-3-2] [REFERRED TO]
ABDUL RASHID VS. STATE OF U P [LAWS(ALL)-2006-9-169] [REFERRED TO]
SULOCHANA CHANDRAKANT GALANDE VS. PUNE MUNICIPAL TRANSPORT [LAWS(SC)-2010-8-55] [REFERRED TO]
M NAGABHUSHANA VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [LAWS(SC)-2011-2-7] [REFERRED TO]
NATIONAL THERMAL POWER POWER CORPORATION LTD VS. MAHESH DUTTA [LAWS(SC)-2009-7-58] [REFERRED TO]
JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VS. SITA RAM [LAWS(SC)-1997-2-138] [FOLLOWED]
BANDHU BAXIA VS. STATE OF ORISSA [LAWS(ORI)-2009-4-37] [REFERRED TO]
GAUTAM ESTATES PVT LTD VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [LAWS(RAJ)-2008-9-157] [REFERRED]
VAVADIYA PRAVINKUMAR PARSHOTAMBHAI VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2017-6-153] [REFERRED TO]
KUNVARBEN DEVRAJBHAI NASIT W/O RAMJIBHAI DAHYABHAI VADARIA VS. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT [LAWS(GJH)-2017-6-322] [REFERRED TO]
MAJIDBHAI ABDULBHAI & OTHERS VS. STATE OF GUJARAT & OTHER [LAWS(GJH)-2015-2-284] [REFERRED]
TARA CHAND CHOWDHURY VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [LAWS(CAL)-2010-2-103] [REFERRED TO]
JIBAN KUMAR GHOSH VS. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [LAWS(CAL)-2009-11-19] [REFERRED TO]
DINESH KUMAR & OTHERS VS. STATE OF U P ,THRU PRIN SECY , REVENUE, & OTHERS [LAWS(ALL)-2018-3-407] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF PUNJAB VS. SANJEET SINGH GREWAL [LAWS(SC)-2007-7-22] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

Kirpal, J. - (1.)In these appeals the challenge is to the decision of the Rajasthan High Court who had upheld the acquisition of land of the appellants which had been acquired by the respondents under the provisions of the Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said Act').
(2.)The proceedings for acquisition of land of the appellants commenced with the State of Rajasthan issuing notification dated 10th October, 1979, under Section 52 (2) of the said Act proposing to acquire the land, described in the said notification, which was situated in various villages in and around the city of Jaipur. The notification stated that it was necessary to acquire the land mentioned therein for improvement of land of Sector 1A of Jaipur City for the purposes of multipurposes schemes, i. e., for the construction of buildings residential, commercial and industrial units. By this notification information was given to all the concerned owners and persons interested in the land which was sought to be acquired to file any objections, which they had, against the proposed acquisition. In respect of the land of the appellants notification under Section 52 (1) of the said Act was issued on 20th April, 1984. It was stated therein that the land mentioned in the said notification was needed under the said Act for the improvement of urban areas and this notification was issued after considering those objections which had been filed by the interested persons. It was also notified that on the date of publication of the said notification in the Rajasthan Rajpatra "the said land shall be vested in the State Government free from all encumbrances". Though, this notification was dated 7th March, 1984, the same was however, published in the Rajasthan Rajpatra on 20th April, 1984.
(3.)The Land Acquisition Act, 1894, was extended to the State of Rajasthan on 24th September, 1984. Some of the persons whose lands were acquired filed suits challenging the acquisition proceedings under Section 52 of the said Act. According to the appellants the said suits were dismissed on 2nd September, 1986. Awards were passed on different dates. In the present appeals the awards were passed on 30th September, 1988, 30th November, 1988 and 28th June, 1989.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.