HARICHARAN Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
LAWS(SC)-2011-3-94
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: MADHYA PRADESH)
Decided on March 09,2011

HARICHARAN,NATHURAM,RAM UJAGAR SINGH,ANIL KUMAR SINGH KUSHWAHA Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Respondents





Cited Judgements :-

ASIYA WIDOW OF SAYED KHWAJA AYUB VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTER OF HOME AFFAIRS MANTRALAYA [LAWS(BOM)-2012-4-8] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH VS. RAM BHAROS RAJWADE [LAWS(CHH)-2012-7-53] [REFERRED TO]
MADHU DESSAI VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2011-5-17] [REFERRED TO]
RINA DATTA VS. STATE OF TRIPURA [LAWS(GAU)-2013-1-24] [REFERRED TO]
MADHU DESSAI AND ORS VS. STATE OF GOA [LAWS(BOM)-2011-5-119] [REFERRED]
PRADEEP S/O PURSHOTTAM DAS VAISHNAV VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH D M BILASPUR [LAWS(CHH)-2016-9-47] [REFERRED]
STATE OF RAJASTHAN VS. AVNISH KUMAR GAUR [LAWS(RAJ)-2011-5-2] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF M P VS. PARMESHWAR NAI [LAWS(CHH)-2012-10-24] [REFERRED TO]
VINOD JASWANTRAY VYAS VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2017-2-195] [REFERRED TO]
SURESH S/O POCHANNA KUROLLU VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2021-9-153] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

Surinder Singh Nijjar, J. - (1.)These appeals have been filed against the judgment of the High Court of Judicature of Madhya Pradesh in Criminal Appeal No. 79 of 1990 whereby the High Court accepted the appeal of the State of Madhya Pradesh and convicted the Appellants herein for an offence under Section 304 Part II and sentenced them to five years R.I. and fine of Rs. 5,000/- each and further convicted the Appellants under Section 330 IPC and sentenced them to three years R.I. In so doing, the High Court reversed the judgment of the trial court in Sessions Case No. 8 of 1988 dated 7th March, 1989 whereby the Appellants were acquitted of all the offences under Section, 343, 330 and 304 Part II IPC.
(2.)At that relevant time, all the Appellants were police officers and posted at Police Station Indar, District Shivpuri. Anil Kumar Kushwaha, Appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 584 of 2003 was posted as the Station House Officer of the aforesaid Police Station. Ram Ujagar, Appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 583 of 2003 was posted as Head Constable. Nathuram, Appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 582 of 2003 was also posted as Head Constable. Haricharan and Mazid Hussain, Appellants in Criminal Appeal No. 581 of 2003 were posted as Constables.
(3.)Briefly stated the prosecution case, as noticed by the High Court is that Mathura was called to the Police Station through Head Constable Ram Ujagar with regard to the investigation of Crime Case No. 57 of 1983 for offence punishable under Section 457 and 380 IPC. He was interrogated at the Police Station and was confined in the lock up. While he was confined in the lock up, he was subjected to third degree torture. He was given electric shock on his scrotum with the intention to extort the confession for the crime of the alleged theft. As due to the torture and electric shocks, condition of Mathura deteriorated, he was released on 11th October, 1983. According to the prosecution, Mathura was unlawfully detained in the Police Station from 8th October, 1983 till 11th October, 1983. The police had neither made any entry about his detention in the police records nor about his discharge.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.