BANGARU LAXMAN Vs. STATE
LAWS(SC)-2011-11-46
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Decided on
November 22,2011
BANGARU LAXMAN
Appellant
VERSUS
STATE
Respondents
Referred Judgements :-
LORD CAIRNS AND LORD BLACKBURN IN ARTHUR HILL V. EAST AND WEST INDIA DOCK CO. [REFERRED TO]STATE OF TRAVANCORE COCHIN VS. SHANMUGHA VILAS CASHEWNUT FACTORY QUILON [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. SINGHARA SINGH [REFERRED TO]
LT COMMANDER PASCAL FERNANDES VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF TAMIL NADU VS. V KRISHNASWAMI NAIDU [REFERRED TO]
A R ANTULAY VS. RAMDAS SRINIWAS NAYAK [REFERRED TO]
J K COTTON SPINNING AND WEAVING MILLS LIMITED VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
HARSHAD S MEHTA VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [REFERRED TO]
Cited Judgements :-
CHIRAYINKEEZHU SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK VS. K. SANTHOSH AND ORS. [LAWS(KER)-2015-9-54] [REFERRED TO]MRIGEN SAIKIA VS. STATE OF ASSAM [LAWS(GAU)-2022-7-4] [REFERRED TO]
MAMMUNHI THALANGADI MAHAMOOD VS. STATE OF KERALA [LAWS(KER)-2013-12-58] [REFERRED TO]
ASHOK SEHGAL S/O LATE SH MAN CHAND SEHGAL VS. STATE OF H P THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME AND VIGILANCE [LAWS(HPH)-2012-6-24] [REFERRED TO]
A. SRINIVASULU VS. STATE [LAWS(SC)-2023-6-9] [REFERRED TO]
SANJAY JAIN @ NAWAB VS. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN [LAWS(RAJ)-2017-9-172] [REFERRED TO]
V ARULKUMAR VS. STATE [LAWS(MAD)-2013-3-243] [REFERRED TO]
TIPRU BURUMA VS. NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY, NEW DELHI [LAWS(JHAR)-2020-10-2] [REFERRED TO]
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE VS. FIAT INDIA P LTD [LAWS(SC)-2012-8-54] [REFERRED TO]
AKILA RAMACHANDRA PRASAD VS. STATE [LAWS(MAD)-2015-6-408] [REFERRED TO]
ANOSH EKKA VS. STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS. [LAWS(JHAR)-2018-1-194] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VS. YUVRAJ S/O KASHINATH SABLE [LAWS(BOM)-2014-12-158] [REFERRED TO]
MOHAN LAL RATHI VS. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION [LAWS(ALL)-2018-8-4] [REFERRED TO]
DEEPAK GUPTA VS. STATE OF ORISSA [LAWS(ORI)-2019-8-1] [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF ODISHA VS. REGISTRAR GENERAL [LAWS(ORI)-2022-1-9] [REFERRED TO]
SURESH RAJ VS. NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY [LAWS(KER)-2022-6-21] [REFERRED TO]
P.C. MISHRA VS. STATE (C.B.I.) [LAWS(SC)-2014-3-57] [REFERRED TO]
RAJKUMAR SAHU VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH [LAWS(CHH)-2020-7-31] [REFERRED TO]
NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY VS. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH [LAWS(CHH)-2022-3-1] [REFERRED TO]
GURVINDER SINGH BHATIA VS. CBI [LAWS(DLH)-2015-10-171] [REFERRED TO]
SWARAN SINGH VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [LAWS(P&H)-2022-9-106] [REFERRED TO]
MUNICIPAL COUNCIL JAIPUR VS. SETH HAMEER MAL GOLECHA [LAWS(RAJ)-2012-3-38] [REFERRED TO]
STATE VS. V. ARULKUMAR [LAWS(SC)-2016-5-96] [REFERRED TO]
SHRI MOHAN LAL RATHI VS. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION [LAWS(ALL)-2018-8-266] [REFERRED TO]
MOHAN LAL RATHI VS. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION [LAWS(ALL)-2018-5-56] [REFERRED TO]
JUDGEMENT
Asok Kumar Ganguly, J. -
(1.)Leave granted.
(2.)The challenge in these appeals is to an order dated 17.7.2006 by which the learned Special Judge granted pardon to Respondent No. 2-Shri T. Satyamurty on the condition that the said Respondent shall make full disclosure of the facts and circumstances relating to the offence committed by him in conspiracy with the Appellant and one Shri N. Umamaheshwar Raju.
(3.)The charge-sheet in this case was filed next day i.e. 18.7.2006 against the Appellant and Shri N. Umamaheshwar Raju. The said order granting pardon was challenged before the High Court but the said challenge was turned down by the High Court by its order dated 30.8.2010. The main argument by the appellant in this case is that pardon could not be granted by the Special Court prior to the filing of the charge-sheet.
(2.)The challenge in these appeals is to an order dated 17.7.2006 by which the learned Special Judge granted pardon to Respondent No. 2-Shri T. Satyamurty on the condition that the said Respondent shall make full disclosure of the facts and circumstances relating to the offence committed by him in conspiracy with the Appellant and one Shri N. Umamaheshwar Raju.
(3.)The charge-sheet in this case was filed next day i.e. 18.7.2006 against the Appellant and Shri N. Umamaheshwar Raju. The said order granting pardon was challenged before the High Court but the said challenge was turned down by the High Court by its order dated 30.8.2010. The main argument by the appellant in this case is that pardon could not be granted by the Special Court prior to the filing of the charge-sheet.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.