UMMU SABEENA Vs. STATE OF KERALA
LAWS(SC)-2011-11-43
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM: KERALA)
Decided on November 17,2011

UMMU SABEENA Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF KERALA Respondents





Cited Judgements :-

ASHFAQ @ NEHAL VS. UNION OF INDIA & 3 OTHERS [LAWS(ALL)-2018-4-75] [REFERRED TO]
MUTHULAKSHMI VS. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT [LAWS(MAD)-2017-1-421] [REFERRED TO]
SUBRATA ROY SAHARA VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(SC)-2014-5-4] [REFERRED TO]
JOIT KUMAR JAIN VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [LAWS(P&H)-2014-3-52] [REFERRED TO]
RITLAL RAI VS. U.O.I. [LAWS(PAT)-2020-8-12] [REFERRED TO]
SAT PAL JAIN VS. JOINT SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA [LAWS(P&H)-2014-3-50] [REFERRED TO]
KESHAB SARKAR VS. STATE OF TRIPURA [LAWS(TRIP)-2019-2-55] [REFERRED TO]
JIGNESH @ MUNNABHAI RAJNIBHAI CHOTAI VS. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE RAJKOT [LAWS(GJH)-2012-12-213] [REFERRED TO]
PARAMASIVAM VS. STATE [LAWS(MAD)-2017-1-489] [REFERRED TO]
TARANNUM VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA [LAWS(KAR)-2023-6-355] [REFERRED TO]
P. SURENDRA VS. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS. [LAWS(APH)-2015-10-7] [REFERRED TO]
JAVID AHMAD DAR VS. U.T. OF J&K [LAWS(J&K)-2022-10-58] [REFERRED TO]
JUNAID ZAHOOR BANGROO VS. UNION TERRITORY OF J&K [LAWS(J&K)-2024-12-1] [REFERRED TO]
MITHELESH VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU [LAWS(MAD)-2022-10-21] [REFERRED TO]
USHA VS. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME, PROHIBITION AND EXCISE DEPARTMENT [LAWS(MAD)-2017-2-477] [REFERRED TO]
RABEKKAL VS. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME, PROHIBITION & EXCISE DEPARTMENT [LAWS(MAD)-2017-2-415] [REFERRED TO]
BALAJI VS. STATE OF TAMILNADU [LAWS(MAD)-2017-2-379] [REFERRED TO]
SABYASACHI DUTT VS. THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ORS. [LAWS(MEGH)-2015-12-3] [REFERRED TO]
SUNITHA VS. ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT [LAWS(MAD)-2022-11-130] [REFERRED TO]
SABOOR AHMAD SHERGOJRI VS. UNION TERRITORY OF J&K [LAWS(J&K)-2024-4-3] [REFERRED TO]
JEHANGIR AHMAD MIR VS. UT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR [LAWS(J&K)-2024-3-12] [REFERRED TO]
UNION OF INDIA VS. CONTINETAL COMMERCIAL CORPORATION AHMEDABAD [LAWS(GJH)-2012-1-155] [REFERRED TO]
DAYARAM NANUBHAI VIRVAL THRO BROTHER MAHESH NANUBHAI VS. STATE OF GUJARAT THRO DY.SECRETARY [LAWS(GJH)-2012-12-205] [REFERRED TO]
SRIDHAR VS. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME PROHIBITION & EXCISE DEPARTMENT [LAWS(MAD)-2017-2-452] [REFERRED TO]
VASANTHU SUMALATHA AND OTHER VS. STATE OF ANDHARA PRADESH REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY HYDERABAD AND OTHER [LAWS(APH)-2015-9-93] [REFERRED TO]
G. ARCHANA AND ORS. VS. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS. [LAWS(APH)-2015-6-72] [REFERRED TO]
IMRAN VS. UNION OF INDIA [LAWS(ALL)-2018-2-52] [REFERRED TO]
ASHOK SADARANGANI VS. STATE OF PUNJAB [LAWS(P&H)-2014-3-53] [REFERRED TO]
ABDUL NASAR ADAM ISMAIL VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(SC)-2013-4-7] [REFERRED TO]
D MAHESH @ MAHESHKUMAR VS. GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU [LAWS(MAD)-2017-1-378] [REFERRED TO]
T. KOTTAISAMY VS. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, CHENNAI [LAWS(MAD)-2017-1-233] [REFERRED TO]
RAVI HANUMANT THORAT VS. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA [LAWS(BOM)-2013-3-53] [REFERRED TO]
BADRI YADAV VS. THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. [LAWS(PAT)-2016-1-86] [REFERRED TO]
SHAFIN JAHAN VS. ASOKAN K.M. & ORS. [LAWS(SC)-2018-4-114] [REFERRED TO]
K LAVANYA VS. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME PROHIBITION & EXCISE DEPARTMENT [LAWS(MAD)-2017-1-393] [REFERRED TO]
GEHRILAL UDAJI KHATIK VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2012-12-330] [REFERRED TO]
MUNUSAMY VS. STATE OF TAMIL NADU [LAWS(MAD)-2017-2-440] [REFERRED TO]
ATHILAKSHMI VS. STATE OF TAMILNADU REP BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT [LAWS(MAD)-2017-2-352] [REFERRED TO]
SEJALBEN ARPIT SHAH VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2019-4-134] [REFERRED TO]
J SAMIDURAI VS. GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU REP BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT [LAWS(MAD)-2017-1-379] [REFERRED TO]
MD. SALAM IRAQUI VS. THE STATE OF BIHAR [LAWS(PAT)-2015-9-161] [REFERRED]
SAMALA DHANA LAXMI VS. THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND ORS. [LAWS(APH)-2016-3-25] [REFERRED TO]
HOME SECRETARY (PRISON) & ORS. VS. H. NILOFER NISHA [LAWS(SC)-2020-1-69] [REFERRED TO]
MEHRAJ U DIN PARRAY VS. UNION TERRITORY OF J&K [LAWS(J&K)-2022-11-25] [REFERRED TO]
HARIBHAI CHANABHAI PARGHI VS. STATE OF GUJARAT [LAWS(GJH)-2012-9-367] [REFERRED TO]


JUDGEMENT

- (1.)Leave granted.
(2.)All these four appeals have been filed impugning an order dated 30th September, 2011 of the High Court of Kerala whereby the writ petitions filed for issuance of writs of Habeas Corpus, assailing the orders of detention dated 26th February, 2011 passed under the provisions of Conservation of Foreign Exchange and prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as 'the COFEPOSA') were rejected by the High Court.
(3.)It is not in dispute that the facts in all the cases are the same. Common ground is that an order of detention under Section 3 of the COFEPOSA was served on all the detenus on 10th March, 2011 on whose behalf petitions were filed before the High Court and therefore, their detention under the COFEPOSA commenced on and from 10th March, 2011. In these proceedings, we are not going into the merits of the grounds or the recitals thereof.


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.